Recently, Libra about Facebook has caused widespread public debates at home and abroad. However, although various seminars are very lively, there is often a phenomenon of “chicken talking with ducks”, that is, lack of effective research consensus. The so-called consensus does not mean that a consistent view must be formed, but rather that there should be a common basis and perspective for discussing the issue.
As we all know, with the advent of encrypted digital currency, the original concept, theory and operation of the currency have received unprecedented attention and challenges. The original digital digitization path and the impact of new digital currencies, legal digital currency and private digital currency, traditional scenes The “private currency” and the “digital private currency” of the Internet scene are intertwined with various concepts, increasing the difficulty and complexity of understanding the problem.
In this regard, we believe that Libra's hot discussion is an opportunity, no matter how big its impact, we must face the impact of the digital era has been extended from the economic society to the financial sector. It should be said that the digital trend has changed the economic organization model, the social division of labor structure, and the boundaries of industrial organizations. On the one hand, it affects the mode of financial services from the demand side, on the other hand, it also has an impact on the boundaries of the financial industry chain and financial organizations. The possibility of construction, resulting in a large number of emerging financial entities, financial business division of labor and so on. At the same time, corresponding to the digital economy and finance, the entire financial market infrastructure is bound to be deeply affected. The payment and settlement system is the core infrastructure, which requires a new thinking from theory to practice.
- Financial observation: The United States is advancing the delay of the digital currency, causing industry concerns
- Japanese digital currency may hand over answer sheets in February, China and Libra or main driver
- Zou Pingzuo of the Central Bank Institute of Gold: Token economy is the most important target tool for the future market
- Bitcoin fell more than 10% on the day. Digital currency went "downhill"
- Everyone talks: believe that our direction is to move forward-Thoughts after reading "Digital Currency: Inheritance and Innovation from Slate Economy to Digital Economy"
- Japanese legislators say: The yen will be issued by the CBDC, fast!
We believe that in order to better understand the impact of Libra, we can start from the following perspectives.
The first perspective is the perspective of the monetary and monetary system. We must see the emergence of new digital technologies, what impacts and impacts on the original currency concepts and currency boundaries, and what challenges and problems will be brought to the series of systems that accompany the currency. In terms of the definition of currency in the traditional sense, money may have different functions, such as value scales, storage methods, and trading media. The traditional theory holds that the different functions of money must be combined to form a complete concept of money. Of course, there are also a number of non-mainstream researchers who have caused some discussion in history. For example, the so-called new monetary economics researchers, some of them are to explore whether the currency function can be separated, such as whether the accounting function and the transaction media function can be separated. At the same time, everyone is exploring how to redefine the micro-foundation of money in the new situation. There are probably two ideas for people who look at this aspect of research: first, how to determine the position of the currency in the macro analysis, and second, whether other financial assets may replace the currency.
From this point of view, if we are based on the currency perspective, we need to make further judgments. Whether Libra's influence is still at the monetary level or whether it is still far from the currency. In fact, although it has had a budding effect on certain currencies, it is still far from the perspective of the currency.
The second perspective is the perspective of payment clearing. Money and payments have often been mixed for a long time. When we discuss payment, it may be part of the function of money, but the research focus and connotation of the two are not consistent, and sometimes even different. We know that payment clearing is the most important financial market infrastructure, and its connotation is very rich. When we study the payment problem, the types covered on the one hand may include payment systems, central securities depository, securities settlement system, central counterparty, transaction database, etc. On the other hand, the elements considered may include payment functions, payment service subjects, and payment. Accounts, payment supervision, payment system arrangements, etc. In recent years, the rise of payment economics has studied the pricing issues, transaction costs, and principal-agent issues involved in the entire payment transaction mechanism. From this perspective, it is necessary to answer whether Libra has an impact on retail payments, especially cross-border retail payments. If so, how to dissect the internal mechanisms that bring about change. For example, it is based on the original retail account impact under the bank account-based system, or based on the potential impact and impact of the de-accounting and encrypted digital currency structure, which is worthy of our relevant analysis.
In this regard, we believe that, in the global retail payment system, cross-border retail payment is indeed an important “pain point” field, and there are a lot of places worthy of optimization. Second, the scale of the entire cross-border retail payment is limited, and Libra's expansion space in this area is not as big as everyone thinks. Third, Libra may improve the cross-border retail payment pain points, but it is not a subversive effect, because it still cannot be separated from technical, compliance, and product constraints. Fourth, perhaps in some “weak currencies” and developing countries with low payment efficiency, they can win some development scenarios.
The third perspective is the issue of law and regulation. Whether it is studying the currency or studying the experts of payment, it is always inseparable from the discussion of laws and rules. In the past, a group of scholars believed that the existing monetary and financial systems were not natural evolution, but the inevitable result of legal restrictions or government regulation. Under the laissez-faire competitive market conditions, there is not necessarily a currency with two functions: accounting function and exchange means. The two major functions of the currency will be borne by different substances, and the currency exchange in the market. Eventually it will be replaced by "precise barter exchange." In fact, any discussion of financial innovation, including Libra, is inseparable from the changes in the legal environment we face. Objectively speaking, the rapid development of the digital economy and digital finance has already had a major impact on the original legal rules. In the field of financial infrastructure under digital conditions, it is the top priority in the future.
In this regard, what we need to study is what kind of challenges Libra brings to the existing legal rules at the monetary and payment levels, and what development space can be gained in the future changes in possible legal rules. In fact, under the increasingly complex financial regulatory rules of various countries, Libra may be able to obtain some space for “supervised sandboxes”, but the overall outlook is not optimistic.
The fourth perspective is a purely technical and business model perspective. Others believe that although Libra's information is dazzling, the combination with new technologies, especially the application of blockchain technology, does not seem so close. Even with blockchain technology, the indicators in the experimental environment are obviously too optimistic, actually It is even more difficult to achieve in operation. It should be said that in the era of digitalization and financial technology, new-generation information technologies, including artificial intelligence, big data, interconnected technologies, distributed technologies, and security technologies, have already had a profound impact on the financial system, and have completely changed financial institutions. Financial products, financial markets, financial rules. In such a large historical context, what kind of new technical features are embodied in Libra is another important research perspective. Correspondingly, from the perspective of an Internet product, whether Libra brings challenges to the existing Facebook business model and business logic, whether it prompts more involvement in the financial field, etc., deserves our deep thought. Based on this, we have not fully observed the technological advancement behind Libra, and it seems to be more reflected in the transformation of business models.
All in all, we must avoid big changes when we study Libra. We should focus on the issues we need to discuss on the same context, and then continue to deepen. Otherwise, when the study is not based on a latitude, then there will not be too many valuable conclusions. In summary, although we believe that many of Libra's influences are overestimated, it has caused such widespread and historically few concerns, which itself illustrates the problem, that is, in the face of the advent of the digital age, the transformation of digital financial infrastructure has been "Blowing the face." We must use this as an entry point to delve into and analyze the theoretical, policy, technical, and practical logic behind it.
Author Yang Tao (Deputy Director of the National Finance and Development Laboratory, Special Advisor of Zhongxin Jingwei)
Source: Zhongxin Jingwei APP