First, value investing can't explain everything.
Li Xiaolai once said a word in "The Self-cultivation of Amaranth". He said: It is not that value investment is wrong, but value investment cannot explain everything.
This sentence is very profound and worthy of further investigation. What can the value investment explain and what can't be explained? What theory should be used to explain things that cannot be explained?
Of course, we can also try to find some clues. Buffett is the spokesperson and practitioner of value investment. He really made a fortune by practicing the value investment concept. He once became the richest man in the world and is still in the top ranks of the world's richest people. This proves that value investing does make sense, and indeed it is "can explain some things."
- Data | Traditional investment institutions compete in the blockchain field, nearly half flow to tool application projects
- DeFi is the future of the blockchain? See what the top international investment institutions say
But what Buffett is most criticized is that he missed the entire Internet age. There have been many great companies in the Internet era that have lasted for 20 or 30 years. The Buffett family has not voted, which directly led to his leader in the wealth list. Although he has successively invested in IBM and Apple in recent years, IBM should be a loss, Apple is still holding, and the future outcome is still unpredictable. At the same time, the current world's richest man is Amazon's founder Jeff Bezos, who is a typical Internet player.
The change in the ranking of the world's richest man is not only a change in ranking, but also a reflection of the direction of capital and the changes in investment thinking behind it.
Second, changes in investment thinking
I mentioned in the article "Thinking about the Separation of Stocks" that I spent a lot of time thinking about how to value the blockchain and digital currency projects, and I have never found an answer that I am satisfied with.
Because both the relative valuation method and the absolute valuation method in traditional stocks, whether based on cash flow or price-earnings ratio, are based on profit and cash flow, but the blockchain project has neither cash flow. There is no profit, and these traditional valuation methods are not available, but if there is no way to value, our investment will lose its foundation.
Buffett's value investment philosophy has a very important term called safety margin. The margin of safety means that you need to have a valuation of the project you invest in, and a simple estimate of its intrinsic value. Because this calculation is definitely inaccurate, you need to make a discount on the basis of this value to ensure safety, for example, 50% off, then the space of 50% is called the margin of safety.
In Buffett's theory, the margin of safety is a very central thing. But the margin of safety is based on intrinsic value and valuation. If there is no way to estimate the intrinsic value of the project, then the term safety margin is meaningless.
The theoretical building of the entire value investment is based on the intrinsic value. If the standard of intrinsic value is lost, then the traditional value investment thinking cannot be applied in the digital currency field.
Third, the comparison of several investment ideas
In fact, many people do not realize that in the investment field, the underlying thinking paradigm has changed several times. The first time is Buffett’s value investment philosophy; the second time is from the value investment concept to the PE and VC of the Internet era. Investment philosophy; the third time is now, the traditional PE, VC concept has to continue to change.
These three changes are all for a reason, mainly because the surrounding business environment is changing, and these changes are manifested in the following aspects.
From the perspective of investment targets: In the era of Buffett, the company mainly produced goods, such as Coca-Cola and Geely razors; but in the Internet era, the main production is software, which provides services to the outside world; in the blockchain era, The main target is Token. At present, Token mostly represents the right to use.
From the perspective of market size: In the Buffett era, the sales target of goods is generally some local areas, and only a few enterprises can cover the whole country. In the Internet era, when software and services are launched, they directly face the national market. This may also be the Internet. The company's market value is generally an order of magnitude higher than that of traditional companies; in the blockchain era, it is a step further. Token and the services provided are directly facing the global market, which is wider than the Internet for the national market. Maybe The market value of future blockchain companies is generally an order of magnitude higher than the Internet .
From a financial point of view: in the Buffett era, the income, profit, and cash flow of goods are very important to enterprises, and they are the basis of valuation, and these are traceable, because they are related to the production of machinery and fixed assets; in the Internet age, Most of the projects have no income and profit in the early stage, let alone cash flow, and can only rely on the capital to burn money. Only after the project has grown and stabilized, will there be income, profit, and cash flow in the later stage; In the chain era, at present, there will be no income, profit, and cash flow in the middle and late stages of the project. All of this is reflected in the change of the currency price. This is the new wealth logic.
From the intrinsic characteristics: In the Buffett era, the decisive effect is the scale effect . The larger the scale , the lower your cost. You have enough funds to do marketing and promotion, and the brand will be promoted. In the Internet era, because the Internet directly covers the whole country, it is very important for a product to take the lead. It directly affects whether more people will use it. Effect ; in the blockchain era, things seem to have undergone some changes. On the one hand, the network effect is still playing a role, but on the other hand, even if some projects have taken the lead, the network effect is already obvious, but if A new project can make people make money, then everyone will flock to the new project. At this time, the network effect does not seem to be completely decisive. At present, there seems to be no suitable word to describe this state. Maybe you can use the money-making effect instead.
4. What exactly is Token?
To understand the particularity of investment in the blockchain era, the most important thing is to figure out a question. What exactly is Token?
When we talked about the separation of stocks, we talked about a very important difference between stocks and certificates. When you buy stocks, stocks are a kind of financial assets, and the rights behind them are very clear; When you buy digital currency, you buy more goods than financial assets. Token most of the time corresponds to the right to use.
It is very important to clarify that “the essence of most of the certificates is commodities, and the rights behind the certificates are the right to use”, because it means that for many certificates, the most important thing is the commodity attributes, not the financial attributes. Directly, the price of the pass is determined by the supply and demand relationship of the goods, not the intrinsic value of finance.
Valuation of financial assets can of course be analyzed from the perspective of financial flows such as cash flow and profit; but when you value the goods, not exactly the valuation, which is called pricing, you should actually supply and demand. Angle to analyze.
When the supply of the certificate exceeds demand, the price of the currency falls; when the supply of the certificate is less than demand, the price of the currency rises, which has nothing to do with the profit and cash flow of the project itself. If you force a traditional financial theory valuation of a blockchain project, you may have to make a mistake.
Of course, the price of the coin is not completely unrelated to the profit. If the project establishes a mechanism for repurchasing or destroying profits, then the profit is repurchased and destroyed in the secondary market, which can effectively reduce the token on the market. The circulation, increasing demand and thus increasing the price of tokens, is equivalent to the disguise of linking profits with supply and demand, but in essence still through supply and demand.
V. Investment thinking in the era of blockchain
1. From the macro-awareness level: the vast majority of the certificates should be treated as commodities rather than stocks and equity. The commodity attribute should be the core attribute of the Token. The financial attribute is only the divergence or the secondary attribute based on the commodity attribute.
2. From the perspective of valuation pricing: There are many theories in traditional value investing that are common to all investments, such as investment mentality, “others are greedy, I fear, others fear my greed”, such as long-term investment, such as Know the company you are investing in. However, the part on valuation is no longer applicable. The original absolute valuation method and relative valuation method are no longer applicable and require other investment thinking.
I have seen many people have proposed a lot of valuation methods, such as Metcalf's valuation theorem, etc. It should be said that this valuation still has some logic in it, but it is still not accurate. And I personally feel that at this stage, all the blockchain projects are not accurate enough to make investment valuation analysis from a quantitative perspective. In Buffett’s words, this may be a precise mistake. I think the current blockchain projects are Can only be analyzed from a qualitative perspective.
The Internet is similar to the blockchain, so the valuation of the blockchain can be borrowed from the Internet. Although there was no way to use value investment thinking in Internet projects in the past, he had his own set of angels, A, B, and C rounds of PE and VC valuation theory. It also had membership based, page views, clicks, and membership. A set of business analysis methods such as number, target market capacity, target market share, etc., and there are enough Internet listed companies to make valuation comparisons, which constitutes the capital ecology of the entire Internet.
Similarly, the blockchain will need some changes in the underlying valuation method in the future, because Token refers to the use rights more often, and the back is determined by supply and demand, so similarly we can find some real requirements related to the blockchain project Token. Data, for example, based on "off-site premium", "active address number", "coin-day destruction", "new active address number in the past 7 days", "large transfer amount in the chain", "small transfer on the chain" New indicators such as quantity, “DAPP quantity” and “DAPP total transaction amount” are used for business analysis and valuation. Currently, these data, both in terms of data volume and data dimension, need to be more abundant to support the valuation of an industry. Theory .
3. From the perspective of specific investment means: I personally feel that the following several methods for the blockchain Token investment are as follows. These investment methods can all ignore the valuation factors as much as possible (not completely):
A, the currency. The coin is for a digital currency like Bitcoin. In contrast, the coin does not care so much about the price and valuation. Of course, there are some preconditions for the coin, that is, the coin must first maintain a sharp upward trend for a long time in the future, and the coin is preferably limited in quantity; then the currency preferably has real use value and exists on the market. Just need. Not all currencies are suitable for 囤, in fact, there are only a few items that are suitable, such as Bitcoin, which is suitable for the 囤 mode.
B. Fixed investment. There are some similarities between the coin and the fixed investment, but relatively speaking, the content of the fixed investment is more broad, and some long-term valuable currencies are suitable for fixed investment, and the fixed investment is more active than the coin.
In the traditional investment philosophy, there are three elements, the first is the trend, the second is the cycle, and the third is the value. In general , the importance of a trend is greater than the cycle, and the importance of the cycle is greater than the value . What does that mean? That is to say, if this is a big wave, such as the original Internet wave, then when this wave rises, whether you are a boutique project or a garbage project, it will be highly speculated because the wind is here, this is the trend. . In the case of trend determination, the entire industry also has a cycle. When the cycle is up, all the garbage coins and air coins will rise very high, but when the trend is down, all the coins will fall very badly. The relationship with the value of the currency itself is not too great. In the end, it is the turn of value. Whether or not your currency has value will be reflected in the magnitude of the fluctuation of the currency. For example, like Bitcoin, when others fall, it falls less. When others rise, it rises faster, because it has its own unique value. Although we can't estimate the valuation in the blockchain, the trend and cycle still exist, especially the cycle, which we can use.
In order to make good use of the cycle, the best way is to make a fixed vote. The essence of the fixed vote is the mathematical harmonic mean. The harmonic mean is the smallest of all the averages, so as to ensure that the cost of your investment is kept to a minimum for a long time. Do not rely on the valuation to solve the problem of low buy and sell low.
C. Quantitative investment. This may make many people somewhat surprised. In fact, I personally are not very optimistic about quantitative investment in stocks, because my definition of quantitative investment is: Quantitative investment is a programmatic version of short-term operation, also called automation version. If short-term investment is not reliable, then quantitative investment will not be reliable.
But in the blockchain world, there may be some differences. Just like doing futures, some futures strategies don't care about the rise or fall of the market. They care about the volatility of the investment target. As long as the volatility is large enough, then this strategy Can be profitable. The quantitative investment in the currency circle has a similar effect, as long as the volatility of this target is large enough, then the quantitative investment can make a profit. The current digital currency happens to be a very volatile target, so at this stage, quantitative investment may have some miraculous effects (not that it will remain valid in the future, and is related to the strategy used).
Overall, the blockchain industry is still very early in the early days. There are many business models still evolving, and there is no stereotype. Perhaps the real mainstream business model will not even appear today.
At present, our valuation and investment in blockchain projects are still in the exploratory stage. At this time, we must be aware of the changes in the underlying thinking of investment, and on the other hand, we need to have enough patience for future changes and wait and see. It changes.