Programmer BM (EOS founder Dan Larimer) Unexpectedly, EOS, which is led by blockchain 3.0 technology, may one day die in the pursuit of its "technical" knife.
Last year, Aiden Pearce (hereinafter referred to as AP) took the avocado (ENU) airdrop project and increased its price by 80 times. In the currency circle, it caused a group of amaranths. Some even thought that this poor version of EOS (ENU) It is the real EOS.
In a word, AP failed to let ENU replace EOS. After a year, EOS was put in a crisis with the new airdrop project EIDOS. The rules for this airdrop project are simple. If the user transfers any amount of EOS to the eidosonecoin account, the system will return the same amount of EOS, and add a certain proportion of EIDOS tokens. The free EIDOS tokens are tens of times more. The possibility of a rise, such a free welfare, how can it not be crazy.
- "Weika" related proceedings were blocked and the amount of pyramid schemes was up to billions of dollars.
- Featured | Cryptographic currencies will impact personal financial markets, the next bull market will usher in big growth
- South Korea: Taxes on cryptocurrency transactions expected to start in 2020
- How To | Build a Zero-Dependent Application on IPFS (Vol. 2)
- New currency war has started: 5 routes compete with 23 countries to build digital currency barriers
- Mortgage digital currency lending, this DeFi model, can really revolutionize the life of traditional finance?
For a time, the wool party completely captured the EOS network. Ecological participants such as digital wallets, exchanges, and DApp also launched various mining tools to assist in mining. The entire EOS network became the mining machine of EDIOS, and the original transaction. The order was completely defeated. There are different interpretations of the meaning of EIDOS, and AP does not express its position, but at present it has been very clear: EOS is dead (EOS is dead).
Will EIDOS really kill EOS?
The data won't lie, we can observe the clues through a set of data:
According to DAppTotal.com data shows:
1) Yesterday, the EOS CPU congestion index was 100%, while EIDOS accounted for 60% of the CPU resources consumed by a DApp.
This means that the CPU resources of the EOS main network are almost exhausted. Once the CPU resources are exhausted, the common user's EOS transfer, coin transfer, and DApp interaction cannot be completed normally. For ordinary users, this undoubtedly declares the EOS master. The net of the network.
The CPU resource allocation is based on the DOS (share equity voucher) consensus mechanism according to the EOS shareholding ratio. The more coins you have, the greater the right to use network resources. When the CPU resources become scarce, the cost of use and the threshold are also raised accordingly, while the average user does not have so much money, and the CPU cannot be used without renting the EOS network.
2) Yesterday, EOS main network transactions were 19.38 million times a day, and the number of transactions of a single EIDOS DApp reached 18.76 million times, accounting for 96% of the total transaction volume.
This means that BM's painstakingly constructed blockchain 3.0 highway runs through the party feathers of EIDOS wool, sending almost all of the 0.0001 EOS junk trades, and truly valuable deals, such as DApp interactions, users. Transfers, etc., were blocked in the queue below the highway.
3) The day after the launch of the EIDOS airdrop project, the number of transactions in the head games of the EOS DApp Ecology, such as Dice, BigGame, EOS Knights, etc., decreased by more than 90%, and continued to decline in the next few days.
This means that the EOS community has consolidated more than a year of DApp ecology and is about to collapse under the nuclear explosion attack of EIDOS. Originally, the DApp ecosystem was not tepid, and there was a serious lack of innovative gameplay and incremental users. Many DApp developers were forced to renew their lives with a less glorious gaming model.
Under the circumstance of EIDOS, more than 600 DApps in the EOS DApp ecosystem will face an awkward situation. Funds originally used for marketing operations will be diverted to lease CPU resources to maintain a certain amount of user experience. In the long run, DApp developers will face a vicious circle of less and less income, and the investment will be higher and higher, until the death can not keep down. Finally, the EOS DApp ecosystem still did not wait for a "killer" application, but waited for a "killer."
4) The number of EOSREX lock-in EOS decreased by 5.36 million in a week, and the leading position of the DeFi market once again returned to MakerDAO.
This means that EOSREX is on the verge of collapse of the mass rental resource platform. BM's initial intention is good. In order to prevent big customers from selling goods, the mechanism of DeFi lending has been introduced into the EOS ecosystem so that the network resource allocation can be more balanced. This was originally a good move for the convenience of the people. The idle EOS will be mortgaged into the REX asset pool. Ordinary users can rent EOS in a small amount of thousands of times to ensure that they can lease the CPU resources cheaply for the normal use of the EOS main network.
However, the problem is that the big ones are going to take the money to go to the village to speculate, who will mortgage the money here, not to mention the low interest rate of REX. Therefore, we now see that most of the 100 million EOS mortgages are still carried out by some retail investors. Now the problem is coming. After EIDOS comes out, the big players who hold a lot of EOS are going to mine. The fast-moving retail investors are renting EOS. The REX pool is short-selled, and the slow-moving small retail investors They are red-eyed and helpless. Sadly, the medium-sized retail investors who have mortgaged a large number of EOSs into REX want to raise their own dollars to earn higher profits by renting CPUs, only to find that the pool has been hollowed out. Line up to raise coins.
With the EOS of the blockchain 3.0 expressway, the vision is to achieve widespread application of distributed large-scale commercialization and to build basic communication facilities and bridges for the future blockchain world. Therefore, compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum, EOS claims to have certain "technical" advantages in terms of transaction speed, throughput, handling fees, and community governance.
In terms of transaction speed and throughput , EOS claims that its TPS is expected to achieve a million-level, simultaneous online transactions that can carry large amounts of traffic, allowing blockchain technology to connect to today's Internet applications with imagination. However, the reality is that its TPS is only about four or five thousand, and the 100,000-level TPS with the graphene technology blessing in the laboratory state still has unstable factors such as lost blocks. It is a bit idiotic to realize the million TPS . Moreover, under the EIDOS spoiler, the breakthrough of TPS technology has become a wedding dress for the wool party.
In terms of handling fees , EOS does not have a clear fee, making it easier to attract the attention and use of ordinary users. But there is no free lunch in the world. The BM is free on the surface, but it has introduced various market adjustment mechanisms such as RAM, CPU resources, and Net bandwidth, plus the underlying role of DPOS. These free resources will inevitably be used by some of the largest holders of money to manipulate exploitation. EIDOS brought a crisis to the EOS network by killing its CPU resource market mechanism. The fact is that free is more expensive than charging.
In terms of community governance , EOS was expected to be the underlying operating system for distributed commerce. It was very friendly to DApp application development, and the gambling DApp was once prosperous, letting everyone see the growth of DApp ecosystem based on blockchain technology. To a large extent, the future of the DApp ecosystem is expected to give the EOS public chain a greater value imagination. However, the emergence of EIDOS is undoubtedly as long as the cancer in the heart of the EOS ecology. The spread of cancer cells has made it possible for other health applications in the DApp ecosystem to be swallowed up and destroyed. Without the support of the future EOS DApp ecosystem, how should EOS cakes be painted?
Moreover, the misfortunes are not alone, the EOS ecosystem still has hackers' persistent attacks, super-brows bribery, frequent network vulnerabilities and many other issues, and has already overdrawn the trust of the community.
Programmer BM is smart enough to design complex market mechanisms such as RAM, CPU, NET, etc., trying to achieve more rational allocation of resources through market free regulation, wider distribution of EOS chips, more prosperous DApp ecology, etc., vision It is wonderful, and the cake is big enough. Unfortunately, in today's blockchain world, only one Token market is very maneuverable, and BM has also created three markets that may be manipulated. As the teacher laughed, the so-called consensus mechanism is a consensus between machines and machines, not a consensus between people. When EOS abandoned the Bitcoin POW consensus mechanism and started DPOS testing, it has already buried all kinds of bane, and how to adjust the handling of "humanity" instability, obviously relying solely on "technology" is not feasible.
A while back, MeetOne team members vomit BM is genius in the blockchain "technology", but it is really stupid in the community "governance". Now it seems that such a spit is not unreasonable. While expanding the technology construction , BM should consider the development of the DApp community ecology, consider the problem of the allocation of scarce resources, consider each ecological partner, and even every user experience.
Unfortunately, programmer BM does not seem to care about this. In explaining the airdrop crisis of EIDOS, BM thinks that the main network CPU shortage status is unnecessary, which is the same as complaining that Uber car peak period can not be reversed, the fare premium is the same. Long snacks, BM amnesty, most people can't use EOS network, what is the value of EOS? What about wool? !
The sigh is that most of the leeks are still optimistic about this. I think that ordinary users can't transfer money and use EOS. There is no way to buy and sell EOS frequently, so the price of EOS will stabilize and the big money will be big. The dealers will wait for the opportunity to pull the plate. Poorly, my classmates are all in such a position, and I still don’t forget the milk EOS dad.
It is said that EOS is dead now, although it is still early, but it is not alarmist. You know, EIDOS, a cancer cell that has to spread for 15 months, without any control for its development, can be imagined. Now the entire blockchain technology layer, bitcoin isolation verification, Ethereum 2.0 slice casper, lightning network side chain, FileCoin distributed storage, polkadot\Cosmos cross-chain and other technologies are accelerating, and more like Libra, DCEP and other regular military Joining, leaving EOS self-help time is really not much. Here, in the attitude of self-cultivation of amaranth, give some official remedies:
1. Does the EOS official with billions of dollars in assets on the account consider taking another official bailout to get rid of the CPU resources, just like the 3 million EOS rescue RAM market, but also tens of millions EOS mortgages into EOSREX to release more leaseable EOS, suppressing high-priced CPU resources and making EOS networks available to ordinary users.
2, if possible, may wish to distribute some CPU resource subsidies to game developers in the DApp ecosystem. Although developers can choose to pay the CPU for the average user to retain the user, this is the official direction of EOS encouragement, but the survival pressure faced by developers, EOS official also give some subsidies?
3. Optimize the regulation of CPU and RAM market mechanisms. EOSREX is certainly a good innovation to save CPU resources, but the air strikes of EIDOS have revealed that the mechanism is not perfect, and there is still room for improvement. I don't dare to think about whether there will be similar airdrop projects and then air raid on the RAM market. I think there are still possibilities. There are too many BUGs in this kind of market self-regulation, and it is necessary to work harder on governance.
I really don't want to see BM God going to run for his fourth project. . .