Can EOS 'centralization problem be solved by sharding?

The issue of centralization of the EOS network has once again sparked discussion. EOS Block Producer (BP) EOS New York revealed yesterday that at least six other BPs are actually owned by one entity. EOS New York requires that these BPs be disqualified.


The EOS network is run by 21 BPs, and the candidates for BP are determined by voting (the competition for the top 21 is fierce). If someone can control most BPs, they will be able to do some malicious behavior, such as reviewing transactions. However, this model has some problems, that is, it is difficult to judge whether there is collusion between BPs-this seems to have happened in the past. It seems that these problems are still haunting the network.

EOS New York tweeted six BP messages-all publicly visible, showing that they were registered by the same person or organization at the same time. The 6 BPs in question are: "stargalaxybp, validatoreos, eoszeusiobp1, eosunioniobp, eosathenabp1, and eosrainbowbp."

EOS New York stated:

"This is intolerable. So we recommend removing these BPs."

EOS New York also requires the first 50 BPs in the EOS network to sign in an attempt to determine if more of them belong to the same group. However, this will not affect organizations that have registered multiple BPs under different companies-or any collusion organization.

Twitter users have many different views on the news. Some people call this kind of thing a "hamster" game, which requires a lot of effort to study, but can only provide a temporary solution. This is because it is much easier for BP to secretly collude with each other than for a white hat hacker to reveal such behavior.

There have been reports in the past that BP colluded with each other on the EOS network. At the time, EOS development company said that it "knows about some unsubstantiated claims involving irregular BP voting and subsequent denials of those claims."

Recently, EOS New York was voted out of the list of the top 21 BPs-although it has been helping to operate the network for the past year and has gained widespread support. Observers said a group of Chinese BPs (which accounted for a significant proportion of the 21 BPs) colluded to exclude them.

Loyal supporters of EOS claim that its constitution-a system of rules for everyone who uses the EOS network-will prevent such behavior. However, in April this year, BP broke the constitution. They replaced the constitution with a new user agreement. However, this new user agreement also seems to be invalid.

For the issue of the EOS network, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said that it can be solved by sharding technology.

Sharding is a layer 1 expansion solution featuring Ethereum 2.0. Sharding is a form of database partitioning, also known as horizontal partitioning, that is, cutting a large database into many small, manageable parts, which improves performance and reduces response time.


Vitalik stated:

"Seriously, I think EOS should use shards and assign random shards to each BP, so that they each need to verify different data, and sharing the infrastructure has little benefit. It can also improve their TPS.

What do you think of Vitalik's "slicing on head"?

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!


Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more


Will "Rare Cong" be the next crypto craze?

Following this year's hype around BTC-20 serial number engravings and the memecoin minting frenzy, Rare Cong may beco...


U.S. SEC proposes amendments to securities issue exemption rules involving token issuance

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has voted to propose a set of rule changes to streamline a...


The SEC issues regulatory guidelines: such digital currency is not a "securities"

The road to compliance with digital assets has taken another big step forward. Over the past 11 months, the Florida s...


Heavy! The SEC issued the first blockchain token supervision guide, whether it is a securities to see four major points

At 11:00 pm Beijing time on April 3, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new regulatory guide fo...


Block.One agreed to pay a $24 million fine to reach a settlement with the SEC. Is EOS the biggest benefit?

According to the news released by the SEC official website on October 1, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (S...


Industry still wait-and-see on SEC's proposal to expand "qualified investor" scope

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a proposal two weeks ago to expand the scope of becoming a qua...