Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin: BCH is not Bitcoin

According to Cointelegraph reported on February 2, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated in a recent tweet that Bitocin Cash (BCH) is not the same as Bitcoin (BTC).

golden-bitcoins-keyboard-metal-laptop-bank (Image source: pxfuel )

On February 1, Vitalik said in response to Brad Mills' tweets about BCH:

BCH is not Bitcoin.

Although as early as 2017, Vitalik clearly stated that BCH was not Bitcoin, several tweets showed that he was not 100% against BCH.

Vitalik's historical attitude towards BCH

A few months after the 2017 hard fork split the Bitcoin network into BTC and BCH, Vitalik posted a seemingly positive comment on BCH on Twitter.

On November 13, 2017, Vitalik wrote on Twitter:

I think BCH is a legitimate competitor to Bitcoin. I think Bitcoin's failure to maintain reasonable fees by increasing the block size is a major change to its 'original plan', which is morally equivalent to a hard fork.

Although someone might interpret this tweet as Vitalik's support for BCH, another tweet he posted on the same day clearly showed a completely different attitude.

He said in a follow-up tweet:

Having said that, * now *, I think trying to claim 'BCH = Bitcoin' is a bad idea because it is just a minority opinion representing the 'Bitcoin Community'.

Vitalik's recent views on BCH

About a year later, in August 2018, Vitalik replied to a tweet about BCH and made comments consistent with his previous thoughts.

Twitter user Meni Rosenfeld wrote on Twitter:

It has been a year since BCH forked from Bitcoin, and it is clear that it has lost its appeal as 'Bitcoin'. BCH had had a chance, but now it should stop confusing the market with the inappropriate name 'Bitcoin Cash'.

Vitalik replied:

I disagree with you. 'BCH is Bitcoin' is unrealistic, but the name 'Bitcoin Cash' itself is perfectly acceptable.

Vitalik does not seem to always have a negative attitude towards Bitcoin, but over the years he has clearly shown the difference between BTC and BCH.

Vitalik commented in a tweet from the BCH Development Fund:

If you want to know which currency I support, I am on the side of the currency that takes product challenges seriously, and I am willing to adjust ideological bias while maintaining a commitment to core decentralized values ​​to help them realize Vision.

Cointelegraph asked Vitalik for more details, but received no response as of press time.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!


Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more


Quick look at a16z's investment landscape for Q1 2023

Investment status of a16z in Q1 2023 so far


Bitcoin supply trend is changing, with a shift towards the East already taking shape.

Bitcoin's year-on-year regional supply changes show that Bitcoin is beginning to shift from US wallets to Asian ones....


a16z Crypto CTO: Protocol Design is More Important than Token Economics

VC firm a16z launches "Protocol Design" course, with its CTO Eddy Lazzarin as the lecturer. Lazzarin emphasizes that ...


a16z: Decoding the Key Elements of Decentralization in Web3 Protocols, Driving Decentralization Tools

Decentralization is key to realizing the potential of Web3 and addressing regulatory uncertainty. However, achieving ...


Blockchain Capital: Why did we lead the investment in Worldcoin? We believe it will become the largest gateway to the crypto world.

Author | Blockchain Capital Translation | Wu Shuo Blockchain Original Link: