BM shared its diversified ideas on the EOS voting governance mechanism in the telegraph group.

According to MEET.ONE, BM said in the telegram group: "According to game theory, we assume that all users of the same vote belong to the same independent individual. The purpose of decentralization is to maximize the number of independent individuals in the network. Follow this line of thought. The 1 currency 1 ticket mechanism also means that the large households control the network before the position of 21, but it is possible that the large households here may represent 1000 individuals who voted the same." So BM shared four kinds of election nodes in the telegram. Ideas: 1. In order to prevent super-large households from occupying multiple block nodes by tokens, we will square the tokens to alleviate this phenomenon, but this also consolidates N heads. The block nodes of large households are more difficult to compete with other nodes. 2. We can have a second group of block node seats using the voting weight of [Pledge Tokens* Pledge Time], which allows the network control to favor those who are pledged by the multi-pledge. The maximum pledge period is 4 years. 3. Finally, we can provide N out of node seats for the holder of the most burning tokens, which is essentially equivalent to a permanent bet. 4. The last type of block node can be elected based on the amount of RAM held, and at the same time, in addition to the holder of the multi-collateral long mortgage, interest will be paid to other voting participants. This idea is only a BM personal idea and does not represent the future direction of EOS. At the same time, in this scenario, the number of outbound nodes is still 21.