Blockchain Bipartisanship: The Crypto Battle on Capitol Hill

Elizabeth Warren's Impact on Crypto Legislation Insights from Former Congressmen Tim Ryan (D) and David McIntosh (R) Ahead of the Election

Elizabeth Warren Chalked the Field’ Former Congressmen Tim Ryan (D) and David McIntosh (R) on Crypto Legislation Prospects Before Election

If you’re a politician, supporting crypto might be a tough pill to swallow. In the aftermath of the FTX collapse, it’s no surprise that many politicians would rather punch crypto than embrace it as a promising industry. Just ask Senator Elizabeth Warren, who proudly declared on Twitter that she’s recruiting an “anti-crypto army.” With the 2024 election looming, the nation is becoming even more polarized. Is blockchain bipartisanship dead in the water? Can we expect any sensible policy and regulation? Let’s find out.

Former Congressmen Tim Ryan and David McIntosh are leading the charge to revive blockchain bipartisanship. They understand that the technology holds tremendous potential for economic growth and innovation. Unfortunately, the United States is being held back by a regulatory system that’s inherently anti-blockchain. As a result, innovation and capital are flowing overseas. But Ryan and McIntosh have a plan: the Blockchain Innovation Project.

Their goal is to educate their colleagues, bridge the partisan divide, and enact sensible crypto policy. They know it’s an uphill battle, especially with Senator Warren’s forceful anti-crypto message painting the field. Ryan believes that the extremes on both sides of the aisle currently define the entire party. That’s why he’s determined to bring more Democrats on board and help them appreciate the merits of blockchain technology.

In a recent Zoom call, McIntosh and Ryan discussed their vision for crypto legislation, the impact of the 2024 election, and their thoughts on the White House’s approach to blockchain and crypto. They both agree that the Biden administration has been “hostile” towards crypto, despite the opportunities it presents for America.

When asked about the upcoming presidential election, McIntosh suggests that true support for blockchain and crypto may come from a younger generation of candidates. He compares this potential shift to the 1990s, when Bill Clinton recognized the power of Silicon Valley innovation and gained the support of tech companies and supporters.

So, what would their ideal crypto regulation look like if they could wave a magic wand? McIntosh dreams of clear rules that provide guidance for companies, such as Coinbase, to operate within the financial system. He stresses the importance of regulation that protects investors and consumers without stifling innovation. Ryan echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the need for bipartisan regulation that strikes a balance between safeguards and opportunities for growth.

Despite their shared goals, McIntosh is more optimistic about the passage of crypto policy before the election, giving it a solid seven out of ten chance. However, Ryan is a bit more cautious, rating the likelihood at 4.5 out of ten. He believes that education and the building of a coalition are key to swaying opinion and creating a conducive environment for future regulation.

The conversation ends on a thought-provoking note. Has crypto become a partisan issue? McIntosh and Ryan agree that the extremes of both parties seem to define their stance on crypto. Senator Warren’s early opposition to crypto has shaped the narrative on the Left, but Ryan remains hopeful that with continued effort and persuasion, more Democrats can be brought into the fold.

In conclusion, while the road to blockchain bipartisanship may be rocky, there is still hope for sensible crypto policy. It’s up to advocates like Ryan and McIntosh to bridge the divide, educate their colleagues, and create a regulatory environment that fosters innovation while protecting consumers. The future of blockchain and crypto in America depends on it.

Now it’s your turn, fellow digital asset investors. What are your thoughts on the battle for crypto policy? Do you think bipartisan support is possible? Share your opinions and let’s keep the conversation going!

This article is part of CoinDesk’s “State of Crypto Week” sponsored by Chainalysis.

—–

Image

(Image source: Coindesk)

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

The three countries of China, Japan and South Korea exchanged cold on the same day? The reason behind it is not simple

Abstract: The three countries of East Asia were once considered to be the gold rush of cryptocurrency, but now the ba...

Blockchain

The data is good for the stock market of the sudden market: Which is the liquidity of the exchange?

This paper analyzes and compares the liquidity of major exchanges on April Fool's Day. In the short time from 12...

Market

Encryption exchange "moving tide": US SEC "strongly pushed away", Middle East and Hong Kong "welcoming with a smile"

Due to the recent pressure from the SEC, several major exchanges around the world are preparing to flee, with the UAE...

Blockchain

Bella Fang: The exchange is at the top of the food chain. How can small and medium-sized projects seize this channel?

On the afternoon of the 9th, at the 2nd Global Blockchain Summit·Wuzhen site hosted by Babbitt, Bella Fang, foun...

Blockchain

Can the community restart and can the losses be recovered? 8 big events to clarify the way for FCoin to defend your rights

On February 17, 2020, FCoin founder Zhang Jian released the "FCoin Truth" announcement. FCoin was unable to...