Ripple Labs Fights Back Against SEC’s Request for Financial Documents

Ripple Labs' attorneys claim that the US Securities and Exchange Commission's demand for financial document disclosure is irrelevant.

Ripple contests SEC’s request for financials, deems it untimely and irrelevant.

Lawyers representing Ripple Labs have filed a response to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) request to examine additional financial documents. In their court filing on Jan. 19, Ripple’s legal team argued that the SEC’s request is invalid because the deadline has passed and the material isn’t relevant to the upcoming trial in April.

Changing Stances and Discovery Phase

The crux of Ripple’s argument lies in how the SEC changed its stance on collecting additional information during the discovery phase. The discovery phase is a legal process where each party is required to share relevant documents with the other. Ripple’s legal team claims that the SEC previously did not argue for post-complaint discovery, which makes the new request invalid.

SEC’s Demands for Financial Statements and Details

On Jan. 11, the SEC demanded that Ripple produce audited financial statements for the financial years 2022 and 2023, disclose all contracts related to the sale or transfer of XRP to external entities made after the initial filing, and provide additional details on the institutional sale proceeds from XRP. However, Ripple argues that the SEC had “ample opportunity” to demand this material during the fact discovery phase, which concluded in August 2021.

Swindling the Court, Slippery Slopes, and Exhausting Interrogatories

Ripple’s legal team doesn’t hold back when expressing their thoughts on the SEC’s portrayal of the blockchain payments technology company. They caution the court against being swayed by the SEC’s portrayal and state, “The Court should not go down the slippery slope the SEC is paving.”

• Moonwell Faces Controversy Over Using Digital Asset Collateral to Offset Bad Debt
• Borroe Finance moves higher on the chart
• 🎙️ The Potential Risks and Pitfalls of AI in Finance: Insights from SEC Chair Gary Gensler 📉

Furthermore, Ripple’s lawyers contend that the SEC has already exhausted all of its interrogatories, which are written questions, in the case and cannot demand more unilaterally. They claim that the SEC used up its allocated interrogatories and is trying to grant itself more.

Q&A:

Q: What is the significance of the SEC’s request for additional financial documents? A: The SEC’s request for additional financial documents is significant because it could potentially strengthen their case against Ripple. These documents could provide insights into Ripple’s financial activities and help the SEC determine whether XRP is indeed an unregistered security.

Q: How does Ripple’s argument about the changing stance affect the case? A: Ripple’s argument about the changing stance of the SEC regarding post-complaint discovery is crucial to the case. If the court agrees with Ripple, it could undermine the validity of the SEC’s request for additional financial documents.

Q: What are interrogatories, and why are they important? A: Interrogatories are written questions that each party can put forth to the other during the discovery phase. They are important because they allow parties to gather information and build their case. Ripple’s lawyers claim that the SEC has already used up all of its interrogatories in the case, which adds another layer of complication to the SEC’s request.

The Trial and Ripple’s Partial Victory

The trial between Ripple and the SEC is scheduled to begin in April. The SEC initially filed charges against Ripple in December 2020, accusing the company of raising funds through the sale of unregistered securities via XRP. However, Ripple achieved a partial victory in July 2023 when the judge ruled that the XRP token is not a security when it comes to programmatic sales on crypto exchanges.

The SEC as an “Out of Control Regulator”

Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, recently referred to the SEC as an “out of control regulator” due to its position on cryptocurrencies. This statement highlights the ongoing tension and disagreement between Ripple and the SEC.

Future Outlook and Recommendations

The outcome of the trial between Ripple and the SEC will undoubtedly have significant implications for the blockchain industry and the classification of digital assets. It is essential for investors and market participants to closely monitor the developments in this case. Based on the judge’s previous ruling regarding programmatic sales of XRP, there is a possibility that Ripple may secure another partial victory. However, the ultimate outcome and regulatory consequences remain uncertain.

As the trial progresses, it is advisable to stay updated on the latest news and analysis from reputable sources. Investors should carefully consider the potential risks and uncertainties associated with investing in XRP and other cryptocurrencies. Consulting with financial advisors or experts in the field can provide valuable insights and guidance.

References:

1. Ripple’s Response to SEC’s Motion to Compel
2. SEC Wants to Compel Ripple to Produce Financial Statements
3. XRP Price Prediction: XRP Drops to $0.60 Support – Time to Buy the Dip?
4. SEC Accuses Ripple of Selling XRP as Unregistered Securities
5. Judge Rules XRP Token is Not a Security
6. Crypto Banter’s Ran Neuner Says Ripple is ‘Despicable,’ Tips Hat to ZachXBT: Hall of Flame

Interact with us! What are your thoughts on the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC? Share your opinions in the comments below 👇 and don’t forget to share this article on your favorite social media platforms! 📱💻🚀

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!