Goodbye SAB 121: U.S. Lawmakers Push to Scrap SEC’s Crypto Accounting Policy

The House Financial Services Committee has also approved legislation to provide the U.S. Secret Service with increased resources for investigating cryptocurrency crimes.

US House Panel Votes Against Controversial SEC Custody Guidance

🏛️ In a stunning turn of events, the House Financial Services Committee has voted to disapprove the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, affectionately known as SAB 121. 📉 This controversial piece of guidance directs financial institutions to hold customers’ crypto assets on their own balance sheets. But fear not, crypto enthusiasts and advocates, the fight is not over just yet. 🤺 The full House and Senate still need to vote on the resolution before it becomes official. And if successful, it will prevent the SEC from issuing similar guidance in the future.

Why the Controversy?

The debate over SAB 121 has divided lawmakers and industry players alike. 💔 On one hand, some argue that the guidance provides much-needed clarity and protection for custodians and investors. 💰 On the other hand, opponents claim that it stifles innovation and prevents banks from effectively custodying digital assets. It’s a classic case of “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” 😫

The Custody Conundrum

One of the primary concerns raised by lawmakers is the impact of SAB 121 on custodians, especially in light of the recent SEC approval for spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds. 📈 The main custodians for existing ETFs, such as Coinbase, Gemini, Fidelity, and BitGo, are non-banks. 💼 This means that if banks have to choose between holding crypto assets and inflating their balance sheets or staying out of the market altogether, it’s not much of a choice at all. 🙅‍♂️

A Difference of Opinion

The debate has also highlighted the differing viewpoints within the House Financial Services Committee. 🤝 Rep. Michael Flood, one of the resolution’s sponsors, believes that SAB 121 hampers banks’ ability to custody digital assets and limits their overall business potential. He argues that instead of forcing banks to shy away from the market, they should be empowered to safeguard assets. 💪

However, Rep. Maxine Waters, the ranking member on the House panel, takes a different stance. She believes that the guidance was offered to provide industry clarity and prevent future regulatory uncertainty. She also points out that overturning the guidance would block the SEC from revisiting the topic in the future. 🛑

The Road Ahead

While the House Financial Services Committee has taken an important step towards scrapping SAB 121, the battle is far from over. The resolution must still pass a full House vote and gain approval in the Senate. 🗳️ The latter has not shown signs of movement on this contentious bulletin just yet. However, Sen. Cynthia Lummis has introduced a counterpart to the House resolution in the Senate, indicating that the fight for crypto custody isn’t going unnoticed. 🔍

Combating Cyber Crime

In the midst of the SAB 121 drama, lawmakers have also been debating the Combating Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act. 💻 This bill seeks to equip the U.S. Secret Service with additional resources to investigate cyber crimes involving digital assets. 💰 The rise in cyber crimes, including those that incorporate cryptocurrencies, has sparked concerns about the security and integrity of the financial system. 💣

Looking Towards the Future

As we await the outcome of the House and Senate votes, it’s essential to consider the broader implications of this controversy. 🧐 Regardless of personal opinions on crypto custody, it’s clear that the outcome will shape the regulatory landscape for digital assets in the years to come. 🌐

📈 Will the resolution pass, marking the end of SAB 121 and opening the door to new custody solutions? Or will the guidance remain in place, providing stability and protection for custodians and investors alike? Only time will tell. ⌛

🔮 In the meantime, investors and industry players should stay informed and adapt their strategies accordingly. Whether you’re a crypto enthusiast or a skeptic, the winds of change are blowing, and the future is approaching rapidly. 💨


🔍 Q&A: What You Really Want to Know

Q: What impact does SAB 121 have on financial institutions? A: SAB 121 requires financial institutions to hold customers’ crypto assets on their own balance sheets. This can create concerns about inflation of balance sheets and the negative impact on business operations.

Q: Why is there controversy surrounding SAB 121? A: The controversy stems from differing opinions on whether the guidance provides necessary clarity or stifles innovation in the crypto industry. Critics argue that it limits banks’ ability to offer custody services effectively, while proponents believe it protects investors and custodians.

Q: How does SAB 121 affect custodians of crypto assets? A: Custodians play a crucial role in safeguarding digital assets. SAB 121 poses challenges for banks and pushes them to choose between holding crypto assets, which affects their balance sheets, or staying out of the market altogether. This dilemma has implications for both custodians and investors.

Q: What is the significance of the Combating Money Laundering in Cyber Crime Act? A: The bill aims to empower the U.S. Secret Service to investigate cyber crimes, including those involving digital assets. With cyber crimes on the rise, this legislation recognizes the need to address threats and protect the integrity of the financial system.


🔗 Reference Links:

  1. U.S. SEC’s Knock From Congressional Watchdog May Not Budge Crypto Accounting Policy
  2. Bipartisan resolution
  3. Argument over the guidance

As we eagerly await the outcome of the House and Senate votes on SAB 121, let’s keep the conversation going. Are you in favor of scrapping the guidance, or do you believe it provides necessary protection? Share your thoughts below and let’s continue the discussion! 💬

📣 And don’t forget to share this article with your friends and colleagues. Spread the word about the exciting developments in the crypto world! 🚀

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Policy

PayPal Strikes UK Crypto License After Temporarily Pausing Local Bitcoin Purchases A Win-Win Situation!

PayPal, a leading payment company, has just been given the green light by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority to pro...

Blockchain

Bitcoin Positions Weekly Report | Multiple types of accounts throw early warning signals ahead of time

On January 18th, the CFTC released the latest weekly CME Bitcoin Futures Weekly Report (January 8-January 14th). Ther...

Blockchain

Data: Demand for Bitcoin from institutional and retail customers explodes

After "Black Thursday (3 · 12)", it seems that Bitcoin is dead in the eyes of some people: hundreds of...

Blockchain

Data: Correlation between gold and Bitcoin hits 10-month high, Bitcoin may usher in important price breakthrough

The global supply chain is facing physical gold shortages in the face of supply chain disruptions, investors fleeing ...

Market

Bitcoin Dominance: Beyond the Surface Level

Why Bitcoin Dominance May Not Be a Reliable Metric in the Fashion Industry

Blockchain

The last decade of blockchain: Looking back at 2010 to 2020

Source | ConsenSys Edit | Summer On January 3, 2009, against the backdrop of the global financial crisis exacerbating...