WSJ Accused of Defamation for 2023 Tether-Bitfinex Article

According to the lawsuit, Christopher Harborne and his aviation fuel brokerage, AML Global, were falsely charged with fraud, money laundering, and financing terrorism.

The Wall Street Journal Sued for Defamation: The Curious Case of Christopher Harborne and AML Global Ltd. 

In a surprising turn of events, Christopher Harborne and his company, AML Global Ltd., have filed a defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, claiming false accusations of fraud, money laundering, and financing terrorism. This lawsuit, which was filed in a Delaware state court on February 28, alleges that the renowned publication knowingly published false information, tarnishing Harborne’s reputation.

The Controversial Article

The article in question, titled “Crypto Companies Behind Tether Used Falsified Documents and Shell Companies to Get Bank Accounts,” originally reported on Tether and Bitfinex’s struggles to maintain access to the global banking system. It suggested that these companies resorted to shadowy intermediaries and deceptive practices to regain entry. The Journal went further, implicating specific individuals and companies, including Harborne and AML Global.

A Wronged Aviation Fuel Broker

Christopher Harborne, the owner of a Thai-based aviation fuel broker, claims that The Wall Street Journal’s article falsely accused him of aiding illegal activities involving Tether and Bitfinex. Harborne insists that the Journal possessed conclusive evidence proving his innocence, yet still proceeded to make defamatory allegations. According to the lawsuit, the accusations of fraud, money laundering, and financing of terrorism are entirely baseless.

🔎Valuable Insight: It’s important to critically analyze media reports and consider the possibility of biased or misleading information. The legal action undertaken by Harborne and AML Global raises questions about the accuracy and professionalism of journalism in the blockchain and financial sectors.

An Editor’s Note and Ongoing Defense

A week before the lawsuit was filed, The Wall Street Journal added an editor’s note to the article, acknowledging the need to remove the section implicating Harborne and AML Global. The note clarified that their attempt to open an account at Signature Bank was not indicative of any wrongdoing on their part.

In response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for The Wall Street Journal mentioned that the newspaper was contacted by Harborne and AML Global’s legal representatives many months after the article’s publication. Following a thorough review, the Journal decided to remove the section related to their involvement and appended the editor’s note. The publication, staunchly defending its journalistic integrity, plans to mount a robust legal defense against the lawsuit.

💬Reader Q&A:

Q: Why did The Wall Street Journal publish the article without verifying the information about Harborne and AML Global? A: The Wall Street Journal bears the responsibility of ensuring the accuracy of its reporting. However, mistakes can happen in even the most reputable publications. The addition of an editor’s note and the removal of the implicating section demonstrate their commitment to rectifying any errors.

Q: How will this lawsuit impact the reputation of both Christopher Harborne and The Wall Street Journal? A: Lawsuits of this nature often attract attention and may have varying effects on the reputation of both parties involved. It is important for readers to keep an open mind and follow the legal process to determine the truth.

Christopher Harborne’s Connection to Bitfinex

While Harborne may not hold a managerial role at Bitfinex, the lawsuit acknowledges his ownership stake of approximately 12%. This stake resulted from the crypto exchange’s reimbursement plan for customers affected by a 2016 hack. It is crucial to note that Harborne’s involvement with Bitfinex is primarily as a minority shareholder, and he has never held an executive position within the company.

🚀Future Outlook & Investment Strategies:

As this controversy unfolds, it underscores the importance of conducting thorough due diligence when evaluating news articles and their potential impacts on individuals and companies. Investors should consider diverse sources of information and seek professional advice before making any investment decisions.

📣Share Your Thoughts: Have you encountered instances of misleading news in the blockchain and financial sectors? What steps do you take to verify information before making investment decisions? Join the conversation and share your experiences on social media using the hashtag #TruthMatters.

Remember, staying informed is essential, and it’s crucial to approach news with a critical eye. Trustworthy and reliable information is the key to making sound decisions in the rapidly evolving world of blockchain technology and finance.

Featured image source

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Policy

Commerzbank: Germany’s Crypto Custody Pioneer

In exciting news for the banking industry, Commerzbank, the fourth-largest bank in Germany, announced on Wednesday th...

Policy

Brazil’s Crypto Landscape: Where Bitcoin Shines and Tether Takes Flight!

During the Web Summit in Lisbon, Coinext CEO José Ribeiro discussed his insights on the current state of Bitcoin and ...

NFT

Moonbirds NFT Trading Volume Spiked Before Yuga Deal: Potential Insider Trading?

The significant increase in Moonbirds sales activity in the days leading up to the deal with Yuga Labs has generated ...

Market

UBS Joins the Crypto Party: Following HSBC’s Lead

UBS Group, the Swiss investment bank, will now allow exclusive high-earners in Hong Kong to invest in crypto-connecte...

Policy

Crypto.com Fined €2.85 Million by Dutch Central Bank for Operating Without Registration

The Dutch Central Bank, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), has taken significant action by issuing a fine to crypto exchang...

Policy

The Bounty Hunter SEC's FY 2023 Enforcement Actions Puts Wall Street and Crypto Giants on a $5 Billion Diet Plan

The SEC's fiscal year 2023 saw significant success with enforcement actions, racking up a total of almost $5 billion ...