Get to know Runes in three minutes A concise protocol for issuing Bitcoin assets.

Discover Runes in just three minutes A straightforward guide to issuing Bitcoin assets.

Author: Web3CN

In a recent tweet, CaseyRodarmor revealed his proposal for an interchangeable token protocol on the Bitcoin platform: the Rune Ordine Protocol. This proposal has sparked widespread interest and discussion in the BTC ecosystem’s interchangeable tokens.

Although controversial in some areas, this type of token already has a certain status in the blockchain field. Their persistence is undeniable, and their development reflects the Bitcoin community’s widespread acceptance of BTC innovation.

In this article, we will delve into the Runes protocol, exploring its fundamental principles, the urgency of its demand, comparative analysis with current protocols, and more. In the process of exploring this new protocol, we will unveil its potential challenges in the ever-evolving Bitcoin ecosystem.

• LianGuai Observation|Intraday rise of more than 160%, is OKT a flash in the pan or a new beginning?
• Garbage Shanzhai’ Investment Guide Profit from Trends and Aim for Big Win
• Unveiling the Mystery behind Bitcoin’s ‘Flash Crash’ Why it Happened and What it Means for the Future

Why do we need a new protocol?

In the ever-evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency field, redundancy is commonplace. With numerous protocols seemingly emerging every day, one might wonder: do we really need so many protocols?

The answer encompasses both opportunity and necessity. Building a strong protocol specifically for interchangeable tokens on Bitcoin comes with many potential benefits:

Revenue stream: A well-designed protocol can open the door to significant transaction fee revenue. As adoption rates increase, so do the economic incentives for miners and the entire network.

Developer interest: By providing a simplified and efficient system, such a protocol can attract the attention of developers.

User base expansion: New protocols can attract a wider user base. This is not just about quantity but diversity. Different users bring different use cases, expanding the diversity and resilience of the ecosystem.

Addressing current shortcomings: Existing protocols, although groundbreaking, have demonstrated various inefficiencies and limitations. A new protocol, drawing from past experiences, can strive for more optimized design.

In the world of technology, standing still is akin to going backward. Rethinking and reinventing on existing foundations is also valuable, especially when the goal is to address existing shortcomings and unlock untapped potential.

Comparison with current protocols

Interchangeable token protocols for Bitcoin are not a new phenomenon. Several proposed and implemented protocols already exist, each with its unique advantages and drawbacks. Let’s analyze some of these well-known protocols:

BRC-20: Known for its association with inscriptions, its design is more driven by popular technology rather than efficient engineering. The result is an extremely inefficient protocol where basic operations, from token issuance to token transfer, require multiple transactions.

RGB: This protocol is relatively complex, heavily reliant on off-chain data, and its development has experienced delays, with limited applications.

Omni Layer: This protocol introduces some native tokens that are required for certain operations. While innovative, they also bring additional complexity and reduce adoption.

Taproot Assets: This protocol, although advanced, relies heavily on off-chain data and may encounter obstacles in implementation and user experience.

Amongst this lineup, the newest contender, Runes, promises simplicity and efficiency. By adopting a UTXO-based system and utilizing the ‘R’ tag in output scripts, it aims to be more user-friendly and in line with BTC’s original structure. However, like any new proposal, its actual implementation still needs to be tested.

Runes: A Breath of Fresh Air

In a landscape where existing protocols come with their own set of challenges, Runes emerges as a beacon of simplicity. Conceived by Casey Rodamor, the innovator behind the Ordinals protocol, Runes seeks to address the inefficiencies of previous protocols, particularly BRC-20.

Origin: It all started with a concept outlined in a rough blog post, and within seven hours of proposing Runes, Rodamor had it up and running, proving the adaptability of the crypto community.

Mechanics

Core Simplicity: Unlike some protocols with multi-layered properties, Runes is elegantly designed with simplicity in mind. By utilizing OP_RETURN in transactions, it enables the allocation of tokens to specific UTXOs, with output indexes, token quantities, and token IDs. This simplified mechanism is not only easy to understand but also efficient in operation.

Issuance and Circulation: The protocol clearly defines the flow and distribution of tokens, reserving a special message for initial token issuance. This ensures clarity and transparency in token operations.

The Principles Behind Runes

The core desire of Runes is to fix the shortcomings of BRC-20. While BRC-20 has been widely adopted, its inefficiencies stemming from reliance on inscriptions have hampered its effectiveness. This has resulted in lengthy multi-step transactions when executing basic operations. In comparison, Runes attempts to simplify this process, streamline token operations, and improve on-chain efficiency.

Caution in Participation

However, despite looking promising, Runes also highlights a recurring theme in the crypto space: quickly adopting ideas without thorough review or long-term design considerations. The rapid acceptance of Runes echoes the same fervor once surrounding BRC-20, which has led to the challenges it currently faces.

In the grand tapestry of crypto innovation, Runes stands out with its promise of simplicity and efficiency. But like all newcomers, the journey from concept to widespread adoption will be a true litmus test of its essence.

The Predicament of BRC-20

At first glance, BRC-20 may seem like a promising addition to the Bitcoin ecosystem. However, upon closer examination, it reveals a complex and often inefficient mechanism for interchangeable tokens.

Complexity: The main challenge of BRC-20 stems from its inherent association with Inscriptions. This combination is driven not from an engineering perspective, but from a trend-driven mindset. While Inscriptions may be a “hot” new thing, it is not the optimal choice for a token protocol.

Operational inefficiency: A major flaw of the BRC-20 protocol is its multi-step nature of operations. Whether issuing or transferring tokens, BRC-20 requires multiple transactions. This directly results from using Inscriptions to encode token data on-chain, necessitating “staged transactions” before actual Inscription data recording.

Efficiency comparison: Compare this to protocols like OmniLayer and the newly proposed Runes. All of these protocols can perform token issuance and transfer operations in a single transaction, while BRC-20 lags behind, requiring two transactions. This inefficiency is not just a technical oversight; it is a sign of being driven more by hype than sound design.

The bigger picture: The struggles around BRC-20 are not just isolated technical glitches; they signify deeper problems in protocol design and adoption.

The adoption and popularity of BRC-20 are due to its fair launch method and early adopters enthusiastically investing and promoting it on social media. This organic growth and community-driven support have propelled BRC-20 to its current status, showcasing the power of grassroots movements in the crypto world.

Summary and Reflection

From the complexity of BRC-20 to the bright prospects of Runes, this journey provides valuable proof of the constant evolution of blockchain and Bitcoin. Each twist, challenge, and solution paints a picture of an ecosystem flourishing in innovation but struggling in its rapid pace.

As the Runes protocol steps into the spotlight, it carries the lessons of the past and hopes to simplify the future. Its promise of simplicity and efficiency is captivating, but the responsibility lies with the community to embrace it with both passion and caution.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!