Binance vs SEC: A Duel of Distorted Interpretations

Binance Fails to Provide Valid Justification for Dismissing SEC Lawsuit, Claims Regulator

Binance’s Dismissal of SEC Suit Lacks Solid Argument, Says Regulator

Ah, the epic clash between Binance and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues! In one corner, we have Binance and its American counterpart, Binance.US, bravely waving the banner of dismissal. And in the other corner, the SEC, armed with accusations of offering unregistered securities to the investing public. Let the battle begin!

The SEC swiftly struck a blow against Binance’s motion to dismiss, declaring that it relied on “distorted” and “tortured” interpretations of federal law and precedents. Ouch! The SEC wants to make it clear that Binance’s defense has no solid footing in the law.

In the midst of this legal scuffle, Binance, Binance.US, and none other than Binance’s founder himself, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, boldly stepped forward to argue that the SEC was overstepping its boundaries. They claimed that the SEC had failed to present “plausible allegations” of securities law violations. It’s a battle of wills, my friends!

However, the SEC counters with a devastating blow, stating that Binance’s argument would upend decades of legal precedent and create a whole new “rigid framework” that lacks any basis in law. Talk about a knockout punch! Binance’s dreams of dismissing the lawsuit seem to be fizzling away.

• Bitcoin Continues to Decline for the Fifth Consecutive Day, Reaching a Low of $266k
• Is the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Going for the Gold? Their Longest Winning Streak Since November 2021 Unveiled!
• Circle’s IPO: From Stablecoin to Stellar Performance

The SEC’s accusations against Binance are nothing to sneeze at either. They claim that Binance’s initial coin offering (ICO) for the BNB token violated securities law. Not only that, but the SEC also contends that Binance’s sale of Binance USD (BUSD) as an investment contract was a clear violation as well. It’s like Binance has been caught red-handed!

But wait, there’s more! The SEC goes on to claim that Binance’s staking and earn programs also danced on the line of federal securities laws. It seems like there’s no escape for Binance from the relentless scrutiny of the SEC.

In a final blow, the SEC dismisses any notion that their lawsuit violates the “Major Questions Doctrine.” This doctrine, which has become a favorite defense for crypto companies, apparently doesn’t hold up against the SEC’s pursuit of justice. The SEC firmly states, “Why should we be stopped from enforcing the Congressional policy choices embodied in the securities laws?” Touché!

So, the battle rages on. Will Binance be able to shake off the SEC and emerge victorious? Or will the SEC’s legal might prevail, reminding all digital asset investors of the power of regulation? Only time will tell, my dear readers. Stay tuned!

Original Article | Image | Video

Let us know in the comments below, which side of the battle are you rooting for? Are you Team Binance or Team SEC? And remember, while the battle continues, always invest wisely and stay updated with the latest news in the world of digital assets. Cheers to your financial success! 🚀💰⚔️

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!