Data | DeFi Transaction Cannibalizes Ethereum Block Capacity

According to data released by Ganesh Swami, co-founder of ETH analysis company Covalent, decentralized financial (DeFi) transactions account for an increasing proportion of Ethereum block capacity, while the share of ETH transfer is declining.

Swami analyzes the gas cost of Ethereum transactions over a period of time to estimate the share of network activity represented by ETH transfers, simple ERC-20 transactions, and complex interactions with smart contracts typically associated with the DeFi protocol. ratio. Because, the gas cost of each transaction category is constantly increasing.

DeFi transaction "cannibalizes" Ethereum block capacity

 

Swami noted that "the total amount of gas consumed by all types of transactions seems to be a natural upper limit", which shows "strong demand for Ethereum block capacity" and its network "lacks scalability", he added:

"In an ideal scalable blockchain network, there is room for growth for all types of transactions. But in today's Ethereum, the growth of one of these transactions must eat away at the share of other transactions."

When looking at the relative proportions of transactions represented by each of these three categories, the data shows that the number of complex transactions at the cost of ETH and ERC-20 transfers has steadily increased-the network activity of complex transfers was 5% from the beginning of 2017 It has grown to around 20% to 30% in recent months.

Relative share of gas fees generated by each transaction category on Ethereum: Covalent

The figure also shows the ups and downs of the ICO. In early 2017, ERC-20 transfers accounted for 20% of network activity. For the rest of 2017, ERC-20's transaction volume accounted for 10% to 15% of network activity, and it fell to 5% by mid-2018.

After a brief rebound to 10% in the last few months of 2018, ERC-20 transactions have been declining, and ERC-20 transfers currently account for less than 5% of Ethereum network activity.

Covalent expects a big reversal on Ethereum

 

Swami predicts that as more and more decentralized organizations (DAOs), games, and other irreplaceable token (NFT) applications are launched on Ethereum, the proportion of complex transactions in network activity will continue to rise.

As a result, the analyst expects that this trend will soon drive a "big reversal," in which complex transactions (as a percentage of online activity) will exceed ETH transfers.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

In-depth explanation of Web3 game engine: Origins and development status of racing tracks, as well as network effects.

We are pleased to see the development process at every level, the release of new games, and the emergence of new engi...

Opinion

Vitalik said he has never sold ETH for personal gain, we took stock of his personal and charitable wallets

Even if Vitalik Buterin occasionally sells some ETH, it will not have a significant impact on the long-term developme...

Blockchain

Bloomberg: The currency stability exchange's own stable currency will be issued in "weeks to one or two months"

According to Bloomberg News, Wei Zhou, chief financial officer of Binance, the main cryptocurrency exchange, said in ...

Opinion

Amazon's participation and the skyrocketing value of AI company Anthropic become FTX's biggest hope of repaying the debt?

FTX previously invested $500 million as a lead investor in Anthropic's Series B financing round, so the expected appr...

Market

With the entry of big players and the halving narrative, is now the best time to buy Bitcoin?

Using the term "ups and downs" to describe the trend of BTC since June is not an exaggeration, or more precisely, it ...

Opinion

OPNX Development History Tokens soar by a hundredfold, becoming a leading bankruptcy concept?

OPNX is the most comprehensive and complete in terms of product conception in the debt trading field, but from the pe...