The CFTC’s Proposal: Going Gaga over Customer Assets

LedgerX Shines Light on CFTC Regulatory Gap in Customer Asset Protection Rules

LedgerX exposes regulatory gap in customer asset rules.

The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is turning into a hawk-eyed detective, now investigating how companies handle their customers’ assets. And boy, do they mean business!

The CFTC has recently come up with a proposal to beef up the rules for futures commission merchants (FCMs) and derivative clearing organizations (DCOs). These companies are now required to invest customer funds in highly liquid assets. But hold your horses, folks! There’s a twist in this tale.

Enter LedgerX, the renegade of the digital asset world. LedgerX doesn’t play by the rules, no sir. Operating as a DCO, this rebel establishes direct connections with clients, breaking away from the traditional role of FCMs as intermediaries. Cue the gasps and the dramatic music.

However, the CFTC’s proposed rules seem to have a blind spot when it comes to LedgerX’s unique operational model. Commissioner Kristin Johnson ain’t too pleased about it, and she’s not afraid to say it out loud. She’s waving the red flag, pointing out that the CFTC’s regulatory framework is lagging behind the lightning-fast evolution of the industry. LedgerX, which used to be affiliated with FTX and is now strutting its stuff with Miami International Holdings, is truly the maverick of the bunch, offering direct client access and dancing to the beat of its own drum.

Picture this: LedgerX, with all its rule-breaking glory, settles cryptocurrency transactions directly for clients. No intermediaries, no shenanigans. They have successfully obtained several CFTC registrations and added extra layers of consumer protection, such as asset segregation. Now that’s what I call independent spirit.

But Johnson has a point to make. She wants a revised regulatory framework that guarantees equal protection for retail clients, whether they trade through intermediaries or dance with non-intermediated DCOs like LedgerX. It’s time for the CFTC to step up their game and bust some moves.

Now, dear readers, this is where you come in. The CFTC has opened up a 75-day window for public feedback on the proposal. Yes, you have the power to make a difference! Your voices, your opinions, your witty retorts can guide the CFTC in addressing the regulatory holes highlighted by Johnson. So speak up, my friends, and let your thoughts be heard.

Ultimately, it’s the CFTC’s responsibility to keep up with the ever-changing derivatives market. They need to ensure that their regulatory measures are aligned with the times, protecting the interests of retail customers and maintaining a level playing field. Who said financial regulators can’t be trendsetters?

Before we bow out, fellow investors, there’s more for you to sink your teeth into. Check out the related article below to discover how the CFTC has been doling out a cool $16 million to crypto whistleblowers this year. It’s like a real-life detective novel, but juicier.

Keep investing, keep innovating, and keep making those waves in the digital asset ocean. As always, it’s been a pleasure dishing out the latest news with a touch of wit and humor. Until next time, my friends!


Did you find this article informative and entertaining? Have you ever had any encounters with renegade digital asset platforms like LedgerX? Share your thoughts and stories in the comments below!

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

The US SEC re-examined the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF proposal. When was the first encrypted ETF approved?

According to Cointelegraph, on November 19th, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is reviewing its last r...

Blockchain

Bitcoin fell below $ 8,600 overnight, and the entire network exceeded $ 879 million

February 27th news, the Bitcoin ETF application submitted by Wilshire Phoenix was formally rejected by the US Securit...

Bitcoin

ETF game involving bulls'? Cointelegraph's unbelievable blunder on 'Black Monday

At 921 pm on October 16th Beijing time, the official account of cryptocurrency media Cointelegraph suddenly tweeted B...

Market

Galaxy Research How big is the market size of Bitcoin ETF? What other widespread impacts does it have on Bitcoin?

Author | Charles Yu Translation | Colin Wu Original Link https//www.galaxy.com/insights/research/sizing-th...

Market

The Bitcoin ETF applicant may be playing the piano, and the SEC committee member said the agency did not grasp the key points.

If there is a canary in the "coal mine" under supervision (in the period when the technology is still under...

Blockchain

Analysis: Why has the US SEC consistently rejected the BTC ETF, and how can it promote dialogue between the two parties?

Author: Greg Cipolaro (Digital Asset Research co-founder) Translation: Zoe Zhou Source: Crypto Valley Editor's n...