Who Gets to Decide Which Transactions are Appropriate for Bitcoin? A Deep Dive into the Saga

The only thing it accomplished was making noise, stated Ava Chow, maintainer of Bitcoin Core, referring to Luke Dashjr's pull request. The proposal aimed to greatly limit the utilization of Ordinals inscriptions, also referred to as NFTs on Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Software Steward Explains Decision to End Heated Code Debate

Image:

Do you ever wonder who gets to decide which transactions are appropriate for the $900 billion blockchain of Bitcoin? Well, let’s dive into a fascinating saga that sheds light on this very question.

The Proposal that Shook the Blockchain

Recently, Bitcoin developer Luke Dashjr proposed an amendment to the open-source software that powers Bitcoin Core. This amendment would have significantly limited the use of data-oriented applications, including the beloved Ordinals inscriptions, also known as “NFTs on Bitcoin.”

Naturally, this proposal sparked intense debate and controversy within the Bitcoin community. But what happened next took everyone by surprise.

The High Priestess and the Shutdown

Ava Chow, a Blockstream developer and one of the maintainers of Bitcoin Core, put an abrupt end to the discussion on the proposal. Like a high priestess wielding her power, she shut down the conversation on the GitHub platform, leaving many puzzled.

🔥🔥🔥 Hot off the presses: Ava Chow, the gatekeeper of Bitcoin Core, shuts down the party!

We reached out to Chow for some clarification, and after a few days of anticipation, we finally received a detailed email response from her. Let’s break it down together.

Chow Breaks Her Silence

Chow’s response shed light on the governance of the Bitcoin blockchain and the core issue at hand. Who indeed gets to decide which transactions make the cut?

In the interest of giving you the full context, we are making an exception and presenting her responses verbatim. Brace yourselves, folks.

Q: Why did you close the pull request?

Chow: As I mentioned in the comment when closing the PR, it was obviously controversial and had no hope of reaching a consensus. When PRs are unlikely to achieve consensus, it’s best to close them. Moreover, leaving the PR open only generated noise and disrupted the developers. Twitter-fueled comments can lead to accusations, demands for major changes, and a toxic environment, ultimately hindering productivity. As the developers’ place of work, we had to put a stop to it for everyone’s sake.

Q: Did you make the decision independently or after discussions with other contributors?

Chow: The decision to close the PR was made independently. However, I did take into account the review comments from long-time contributors who NACK’d the PR and suggested its closure. Their technical criticisms highlighted that the PR, in its current state, was not a good idea and could potentially be harmful.

Q: Have you faced any backlash after closing the PR?

Chow: Naturally, whenever a controversial PR is closed, there are two camps within the Bitcoin community – those for and against. So, yes, I have received backlash and comments from both sides. But this is to be expected in such situations.

Q: Luke Dashjr claims the PR was “inappropriately” closed. Any response to that?

Chow: Since I made the decision to close the PR, I stand by it and don’t believe it was inappropriate. However, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Understanding the Ripples of Blockchain Governance

This whole saga raises fundamental questions about the governance of blockchain technology. Who gets to make the rules? How are decisions made? And what is the impact on the broader Bitcoin community?

As new investors flock to Bitcoin ETFs, it is crucial for them to grasp these deep-rooted issues. Understanding the governance dynamics behind this revolutionary technology is key to navigating the ever-changing landscape of cryptocurrency.

So, remember, the future of Bitcoin’s development lies not just in the hands of developers but in the collective decisions made by the community.


🤔 Q&A: Your Burning Questions Answered

  1. Q: What are NFTs, and why are they related to Bitcoin?
    • A: NFTs, or Non-Fungible Tokens, are unique digital assets that can represent various forms of ownership or intellectual property. While NFTs are commonly associated with Ethereum, there have been efforts to explore NFT capabilities within the Bitcoin ecosystem.
  2. Q: How does Bitcoin Core impact the Bitcoin blockchain?
    • A: Bitcoin Core is an open-source software that serves as the backbone of the Bitcoin blockchain. It is maintained by a group of developers who work on improving the protocol, fixing bugs, and implementing new features.
  3. Q: What is the role of blockchain governance?
    • A: Blockchain governance refers to the mechanisms and processes through which decisions are made regarding the development, rules, and upgrades of a blockchain protocol. It involves various stakeholders, including developers, miners, users, and even the wider community.

The Future of Bitcoin’s Governance

As we gaze into the crystal ball, what does the future hold for Bitcoin’s governance? Will controversies like these shape the path ahead? And what implications will they have on the growing ecosystem?

Only time will tell. But it’s clear that as Bitcoin continues to evolve, navigating the waters of governance will become increasingly vital.

So buckle up, my fellow crypto enthusiasts, because exciting times lie ahead. Let’s embrace the challenges and chart a course to a decentralized future.


References: 1. Polygon Saga: A Gamechanger for Matic Investors 2. How Bitcoin ETF Approval Could Benefit Institutional Investors


📺 Remember to share this article with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts! Let’s spark some discussions on social media and unravel the mysteries of Bitcoin’s governance together.

Have any burning questions or thoughts on the Bitcoin saga? Drop them in the comments below, and let’s dive into the rabbit hole of cryptocurrency exploration! 💬🚀

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

WikiLeaks has received 4,050 Bitcoin donations, Satoshi Nakamoto's concerns will reappear?

WikiLeaks has accepted more than 4,043 bitcoin donations at its old address, worth up to $ 39 million. Assange's...

Blockchain

Samsung smartphones quietly support Bitcoin, but only these 7 countries can use

Korean technology giant Samsung added Bitcoin support to its Blockchain Keystore SDK (software development kit). This...

Bitcoin

Grayscale discussing partnership with JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs for Bitcoin ETF position Report

BlackRock has recently updated its S-1 filing to include renowned quantitative trading firm Jane Street and esteemed ...

Blockchain

2019, 3 Chinese blockchain keywords in the eyes of foreigners

After the ups and downs, ups and downs of 2019, 2020 has arrived, and the stories of right and wrong in the blockchai...

Bitcoin

The Wild Ride of Bitcoin Miners: Holding Strong Above $30,000

Attention Fashionista The upcoming halving of BTC mining rewards will pose a challenge for less-efficient operators.

Bitcoin

Crypto Donations: When Digital Assets Save the Day and Make a Roaring Difference!

The fashion-forward Own The Doge (DOG) and PleasrDAO communities are leading the way on the donor leaderboard, having...