Fantom Foundation Hack: A Billion-Dollar Comedy of Errors

Fantom Foundation Suffers $6.7 Million Hack Report Reveals

Fantom Foundation hacked for $6.7M!

Picture this: a cloak-and-dagger tale of hackers, crypto-cluelessness, and a multi-million dollar punchline. The Fantom Foundation, developers extraordinaire of the Fantom network, has reportedly fallen victim to a diabolical hack, losing a jaw-dropping $6.7 million worth of cryptocurrency. Ouch!

Rumors spread like wildfire when blockchain data stumbled upon an address aptly named “Fake_Phishing188024” siphoning over 2,000 Convex (CVX) tokens and other precious digital assets from the beleaguered Fantom Foundation’s wallet. It didn’t take long for the on-chain Sherlock Holmes, AKA Spreek, to sound the alarm, estimating losses at $6.7 million. Talk about a blockchain whodunit!

But wait, there’s a twist! You know the old saying, “there are two sides to every story”? Well, the security platform CertiK swoops in to save the day, sprinkling a dash of skepticism over the situation. They’re estimating losses at a more modest $657,000. Quite the discrepancy, wouldn’t you say? It seems even the world of blockchain struggles with simple math!

Now, here’s where things get interesting. The Fantom Foundation, brains behind the Fantom network, finds itself in the spotlight. Boasting a whopping $45 million locked within its contracts, according to trusty DeFiLlama, it becomes clear that this hack goes beyond the usual crypto heist drama. It’s a clash between the Foundation and predatory hackers. Will the virtuous prevail?

Of course, this wouldn’t be complete without a dose of suspense. Picture an on-chain hero, Spreek, uncovering the truth. Armed with the power of Telegram, they bravely stand against the forces of darkness. Hacked wallets are revealed, and the losses skyrocket to $6.7 million. But beware, not everything may be as it seems. Reality has a twisted sense of humor, and the drained funds might’ve originated from sources other than the fantastical Fantom Foundation.

We can’t forget the revelation that CertiK adds to the mix. Confirming the hack, they valiantly try to keep a straight face while suggesting losses of a mere $657,000. Maybe they imbibe in a different kind of funny business over at CertiK. Or perhaps sorting out a blockchain hack is like making sense of a circus performance – chaotic and full of unexpected surprises.

As we delve deeper into this comedic masterpiece, the blockchain data reveals more anomalies. Fantom Foundation Wallet 1 on Ethereum throws caution to the wind, sending thousands of Convex (CVX) tokens, along with a stash of Dai (DAI), and a truckload of USDC, to an enigmatic account named “Fake_Phishing188024.” Wallet 20 on the Fantom network joins the party too, sending over a million Fantom (FTM) tokens to an equally suspicious “Fake_Phishing32.” It’s like watching a magician voluntarily part with precious goods, only to realize they’ve been tricked by their own missing private key. Abracadabra, indeed!

As the drama unfolds, the radio silence from the Fantom Foundation becomes increasingly noticeable. Cue the nail-biting suspense! Will they break their silence and set the record straight? Or will they leave us hanging, desperately longing for a resolution to this crypto-comedy of errors?

Well, dear readers, the final act is yet to come. Stay tuned for the next episode of “Blockchain Boondoggle,” where our heroes will either restore order to the crypto-universe or reveal themselves to be the ultimate punchline. In the unpredictable world of digital assets, anything can happen. Comedy or tragedy? We’re about to find out!

Did you bite your nails while reading this blockchain whodunit? Have you ever encountered your own crypto-comedy of errors? Share your tales of triumph and mishaps in the comments below!

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Research Report | Blockchain Economics Panorama and Future: Exchange Compliance

Author: BlockVC industry research team Source: BlockVC Editor's Note: The original title is "Postal Chain E...

Blockchain

Did Michael Lewis's reputation 'crash' by showing mercy to SBF?

Source New York Times Compiled by LianGuaiBitpushNews Mary Liu Hiking is a common interview format for Michael Lewis....

News

Policy reshuffle is intensified: the crisis and new life of virtual currency exchanges

The virtual currency exchange industry may have to "change the sky", which seems to be the consensus of the...

Blockchain

Data Analysis | Exchange Risk, Exchange Capital Reserve and Platform Coin Valuation Geometry

Analyst | Carol Editor | Bi Tongtong | PANews The FCoin thunderstorm event caused widespread concern. In the last par...

DeFi

Postponed Fraud Trial of Mango Markets Exploiter: A Delayed Showdown

Fashion executive, Avraham Eisenberg, accused of a $116 million fraud at Mango Market, will face trial on April 8, 20...

Bitcoin

Restoring the entire process of asset transfer: $6.02 million stolen from the DragonEX exchange

In the early morning of March 24th, Beijing time, the DragonEX exchange issued a notice stating that its platform dig...