Copyright Limitations of “Steamboat Willie” in NFTs: What You Need to Know 🚢🐭

NFTs featuring the 1928 portrayal of Mickey Mouse claimed the top spot on OpenSea's 24-hour trending chart.

Lawyer warns against making unauthorized Mickey Mouse products with NFTs

As the crypto community rejoiced over the inclusion of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) featuring the 1928 version of Mickey Mouse from the iconic “Steamboat Willie” in the trending collections of the NFT marketplace OpenSea, a lawyer has raised concerns about the limitations imposed by copyright laws 💼🧐

It’s heartwarming to witness the celebration of a cultural icon like Mickey Mouse in the realm of blockchain, but according to Oscar Franklin Tan, the chief legal officer of Atlas, a core contributor to NFT platform Enjin, there are legal boundaries that users must be aware of when using the character ↔︎️📜

The Fine Print on Public Domain

While the specific 1928 depiction of Mickey Mouse, featuring the black and white character with a longer nose and no gloves, is considered in the public domain under U.S. law, it’s important to note that Mickey Mouse as a trademark and brand, separate from the character, is still privately owned 🐭💼

So, before you start creating your own line of Mickey products, it’s crucial to understand that the full-color sorcerer version of Mickey from 1940 is still protected by copyright. Additionally, the 1928 depiction of Mickey may still be under copyright in countries with different legal countdowns ⏱️🗺️

• NFT Sales on Bitcoin Network Surpass $881 Million, Ethereum and Solana Trail Behind
• ThankYouX: From Graffiti to NFTs and Beyond 🎨🚀
• In a recent Nifty Newsletter, it was reported that a new development allows those who dislike ordinal numbers to ignore them. Additionally, Sotheby’s digital art sales for the year 2023 reached a staggering $35 million.

Disclaimer: Not Affiliated with Disney

If you’re planning to use the 1928 Mickey Mouse depiction in your NFTs or any other creative works, it’s essential to make it crystal clear that your creation is not affiliated with Disney, the trademark owner 🛑❌

For instance, the NFT featuring the iconic “Steamboat Willie” made sure to specify that it refers exclusively to the 1928 version of Mickey, even if the character is present on his T-shirt. This distinction is vital to avoid any confusion or misleading affiliation with Disney, which is a separate trademark 📢💼

Balancing Copyright and Trademark

While copyright law protects artistic expression, it’s essential to understand that trademark law safeguards the identification of the source of a product. So, using “Steamboat Willie” to mislead consumers into thinking your work is officially associated with Disney is not permissible 📚⚖️

As we navigate the intriguing world of NFTs and digital assets, it’s important to respect the boundaries set by copyright and trademark laws. By doing so, we can promote creativity while also preserving the integrity of copyrighted characters and brands 🌈⚖️

Resources:

• Ethereum Price Retreats from Highs, Technicals Suggest Upside Continuation
• Nifty News: Funko’s Disney NFTs, Sotheby’s Auction Bitcoin Ordinals Project, and More
• Pudgy Penguins GIFs Top 10B Views, CEO Sets Sights on Disney, Hello Kitty: NFT Creator

Q&A: Addressing Your Concerns about NFTs and Copyrights

Q: Can I use the 1928 version of Mickey Mouse in my creative projects without any limitations?

A: While the specific 1928 depiction of Mickey Mouse is considered in the public domain in the U.S., it’s essential to clarify that this doesn’t grant you the rights to use the character for any purpose. The trademark and brand of Mickey Mouse, separate from the character, are still privately owned. Moreover, copyright laws vary across countries, so do thorough research before assuming it’s free to use in your specific jurisdiction.

Q: Can I create and sell NFTs featuring the 1928 Mickey Mouse without infringing copyright laws?

A: Yes, you can create and sell NFTs featuring the 1928 Mickey Mouse, as long as you explicitly state that your creation is not affiliated with Disney. It’s crucial to avoid any misleading association with the trademark owner. By making this disclaimer clear, you can enjoy the creative possibilities while respecting copyright and trademark boundaries.

Q: What happens if I use the 1928 Mickey Mouse in my works without disclaiming any affiliation with Disney?

A: Using the 1928 Mickey Mouse without a clear disclaimer of non-affiliation with Disney can result in copyright and trademark infringement. It’s important to respect intellectual property rights and avoid misleading consumers into thinking your work is officially associated with Disney. By understanding and abiding by the legal boundaries, you can create within the realm of NFTs while safeguarding the integrity of copyrighted characters and brands.

The Future of Copyright in the NFT Landscape

As NFTs continue to gain momentum and reshape the art, collectibles, and digital asset markets, copyright laws will play a crucial role in shaping the future. It’s expected that further discussions and legal precedents will emerge to address the complexities and nuances of copyright in the digital age 🌐💡

Navigating this landscape requires a deep understanding of intellectual property rights and a commitment to respecting the boundaries set by copyright and trademark laws. By embracing innovation while upholding legal standards, we can ensure a vibrant, creative ecosystem where artists, collectors, and enthusiasts thrive 🚀🎨

Now, over to you: What are your thoughts on the intricacies of copyright and trademarks in the realm of NFTs? Share your views and let’s continue the conversation in the comments below! 🗣️💭

➡️ Don’t forget to share this article with your friends and colleagues who are fascinated by the world of NFTs and digital assets! Together, we can unravel the complexities and unleash the full potential of this transformative technology. 🌟🚀

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for specific copyright and trademark concerns.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!