United States Energy Officials and Texas Blockchain Council Reach Agreement to Halt Emergency Survey

Although having agreed to discard all responses from the emergency crypto mining survey, the EIA will issue a new announcement, soliciting public input on the data it can collect.

US energy officials agree to delete all data collected from the cryptocurrency mining survey.

In a surprising twist, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) have reached an agreement with the Texas Blockchain Council (TBC) and Bitcoin mining firm Riot Platforms. This agreement will put an end to the proposed emergency survey targeting crypto miners.

According to a recent court filing on March 2, the emergency survey, filed under the name “EIA-862 Emergency Collection Request,” raised concerns among crypto miners, who found it intrusive. In response to the settlement, all previously collected data will be deleted, and any forthcoming information will be discarded as well.

The settlement effectively cancels the temporary restraining order that was initially scheduled to be in place until March 8. This comes on the heels of the court temporarily suspending the U.S. energy regulators from collecting data while the lawsuit was underway. The Texas Blockchain Council and Riot Platforms successfully argued that irreparable harm would occur if further data collection proceeded.

The plaintiffs highlighted potential damages, including non-recoverable compliance costs, a credible threat of prosecution for non-compliance, and the disclosure of proprietary information. The court also found the EIA’s estimation that the survey would only take 30 minutes to be “extremely inaccurate.”

• WSJ Accused of Defamation for 2023 Tether-Bitfinex Article
• Stablecoin Regulation: BIS Offers Recommendations for Global Stablecoin Arrangements
• State Attorneys General accuse SEC of exceeding its authority in Kraken lawsuit.

The Texas Blockchain Council and Riot Platforms presented evidence that the cost of compliance had already exceeded 40 hours. Nonetheless, both parties have agreed that the EIA can submit a new notice seeking public feedback for a period of two months, focusing on the information it is allowed to collect.

This unexpected turn of events is a victory for crypto miners who were concerned about the invasive nature of the emergency survey. The settlement demonstrates the power of collaboration between the Texas Blockchain Council, Riot Platforms, and the government agencies involved. It sets a precedent for productive dialogue and compromise in the future.

Q&A: What You May Be Wondering

Q: Why was the emergency survey targeting crypto miners proposed in the first place? A: The emergency survey was designed to gather information about crypto miners and their energy consumption. Concerns over the impact of cryptocurrency mining on the environment and energy resources led to the proposal.

Q: What were the objections raised by the Texas Blockchain Council and Riot Platforms? A: The Texas Blockchain Council and Riot Platforms argued that the survey was intrusive and posed potential damages, including compliance costs, the threat of prosecution, and the disclosure of proprietary information.

Q: How did the court respond to the objections? A: The court agreed with the objections raised by the Texas Blockchain Council and Riot Platforms, temporarily suspending data collection until the lawsuit was resolved. The court found the EIA’s estimation of a 30-minute completion time to be inaccurate.

Q: What does the settlement mean for crypto miners? A: The settlement is a significant victory for crypto miners. It ensures that the previously collected data will be deleted, and any forthcoming information will be discarded. It also allows for a new notice seeking public feedback on permissible data collection.

Q: What does this agreement mean for the future of collaboration between government agencies and the crypto industry? A: This agreement sets a positive precedent for collaboration and compromise. It shows that productive dialogue between government entities and the crypto industry can lead to mutually agreed-upon solutions.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Crypto Mining

The resolution of this case raises broader questions about the future of crypto mining and its relationship with energy consumption. It is likely that energy officials will continue to explore ways to monitor and regulate the impact of crypto mining on the environment.

Cryptocurrency mining is a resource-intensive process that requires significant energy input. As the popularity of digital assets grows and more miners join the network, the energy requirements will increase. This poses challenges in terms of sustainability and carbon emissions.

However, there are positive developments in the crypto industry that aim to address these concerns. Some projects are exploring renewable energy sources for mining operations, while others are working on more energy-efficient mining algorithms.

Crypto miners should stay informed about regulatory developments and technological advancements in the industry. Finding ways to align with energy officials and mitigate the environmental impact of mining can lead to a more sustainable and mutually beneficial future.

References

1. Court filing in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
2. Riot Platforms boosted BTC output by 19% in 2023, mines 6,626 Bitcoin
3. Jameson Lopp: Skeptical of spot Ether ETFs, BTC price prediction dilemma: X Hall of Flame
4. Additional relevant article
5. Additional relevant article

---

Thank you for reading our article on the agreement between United States energy officials and the Texas Blockchain Council. If you found this information helpful, feel free to share it with your friends and colleagues on social media. We love hearing your thoughts, so please leave a comment below! 💬✨

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!