Israeli court ruled that bank policy should not arbitrarily close the account of Bitcoin Mining Company

Israeli court ruled that bank policy should not arbitrarily close the account of Bitcoin Mining Company

Translator: Play the coin family ElaineHu

An Israeli court ruled in favor of a bitcoin (BTC) mining company, after a local bank closed its account for money laundering. The Israeli daily business news agency Calcalist reported on this progress on March 17.

Israminers sued Igud (Union Bank of Israel Ltd.) in May 2018, which said the company had frozen its account in violation of anti-money laundering provisions, causing problems with its cash flow.

After a lengthy appeal process, a judge in the Tel Aviv District Court argued that the bank’s policy on cryptocurrency customers was too broad.

Calcalist quoted the judge, Limor Bibi, as saying: "I believe that this comprehensive policy that does not distinguish between different types of activities, scope of activities and different types of customers is unreasonable."

At the same time, however, Bibi said the bank has the right to reject deposits from cryptocurrency transactions.

This incident occurred because the regulator's regulatory policy on cryptocurrency transactions did not form a sound system. As Cointelegraph reports, many banks have objected to the services provided by companies and private investors who trade cryptocurrencies.

Often, this hostile position contradicts other activities of the same bank: for example, the UK-based Barclays also closed its account before establishing a partnership with the main cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase.

In the case of United Bank, executives seem to benefit from education in emerging industries. In November last year, local startup Bit2C held a seminar on how it works.

Earlier this month, a special committee of the Israeli Securities Regulatory Authority issued a final proposal to manage the cryptocurrency economy, which may make the bank's treatment more uniform in the future.

The attached report explains: "The committee recommends that consideration be given to adjusting the existing regulations to establish a more appropriate regulatory framework for this transaction to better cope with the risks posed by this activity."

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Featured | Chris Burniske: BTC goes to gold, ETH goes to currency; every bitcoin bull market starts with miners surrendering

Today's content includes: 1 Chris Burniske: BTC will go to gold, ETH will go to the currency 2 Each bitcoin bull...

Market

Twitter Featured | Euro Pacific Capital CEO: The idea of ​​turning bitcoin into digital gold is wrong

2019/11/12 There are a total of seven Twitter messages today. 1. The cryptocurrency media The Block Bitcoin derivativ...

Market

Interpreting BitVM Bitcoin can achieve arbitrary computation without the need for forking

ZeroSync developer Robin Linus announced the BitVM proposal, which can achieve almost any arbitrary computation and u...

Blockchain

Tiger Fight Forum Hot Discussion: NBA Lone Ranger accepts bitcoin payments

Bitcoin has been controversial and questioned since its birth for just 10 years. This electronic currency has always ...

Blockchain

Depth | Block rewards are about to be halved, is BTC still safe? (under)

Author: Hasu, James Prestwich, Brandon Curtis translation: Harry Zhang Source: Encrypted Valley Report: Russia review...

Market

Bitcoin price analysis on April 9

Key points Bitcoin is still in a steady upward trend above the $5070 and $5,000 support levels. Bitcoin prices are fa...