Israeli court ruled that bank policy should not arbitrarily close the account of Bitcoin Mining Company

Israeli court ruled that bank policy should not arbitrarily close the account of Bitcoin Mining Company

Translator: Play the coin family ElaineHu

An Israeli court ruled in favor of a bitcoin (BTC) mining company, after a local bank closed its account for money laundering. The Israeli daily business news agency Calcalist reported on this progress on March 17.

Israminers sued Igud (Union Bank of Israel Ltd.) in May 2018, which said the company had frozen its account in violation of anti-money laundering provisions, causing problems with its cash flow.

After a lengthy appeal process, a judge in the Tel Aviv District Court argued that the bank’s policy on cryptocurrency customers was too broad.

Calcalist quoted the judge, Limor Bibi, as saying: "I believe that this comprehensive policy that does not distinguish between different types of activities, scope of activities and different types of customers is unreasonable."

At the same time, however, Bibi said the bank has the right to reject deposits from cryptocurrency transactions.

This incident occurred because the regulator's regulatory policy on cryptocurrency transactions did not form a sound system. As Cointelegraph reports, many banks have objected to the services provided by companies and private investors who trade cryptocurrencies.

Often, this hostile position contradicts other activities of the same bank: for example, the UK-based Barclays also closed its account before establishing a partnership with the main cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase.

In the case of United Bank, executives seem to benefit from education in emerging industries. In November last year, local startup Bit2C held a seminar on how it works.

Earlier this month, a special committee of the Israeli Securities Regulatory Authority issued a final proposal to manage the cryptocurrency economy, which may make the bank's treatment more uniform in the future.

The attached report explains: "The committee recommends that consideration be given to adjusting the existing regulations to establish a more appropriate regulatory framework for this transaction to better cope with the risks posed by this activity."

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Perspective | Why isn't Bitcoin a safe-haven asset?

Source: Carbon chain value Editor: Carbon Chain Value Editorial Department Is Bitcoin known as "digital gold&quo...

Blockchain

"Sneaked" Assange's cryptographic life

On December 5, 2010, WikiLeaks angered the US authorities by leaking US diplomatic and telegraph incidents, and was s...

Blockchain

Bulgaria holding 200,000 bitcoins has been cleared, with a package price of 15,000 Euros.

This week, news of Bulgaria's hoarding of 200,000 bitcoins reappeared. It is reported that the Balkan countries ...

Blockchain

Zero fee for Bitcoin transactions, Coinbase CEO gets patent for trading Bitcoin via email

Coinbase CEO Brian Amstrong recently obtained a patent on a Bitcoin system that allows users to make Bitcoin (BTC) tr...

Blockchain

No loss of money or stolen money, this Thai mainstream exchange has announced the closure

Woke up this morning, Thai cryptocurrency traders and investors found an unpleasant surprise: the country's main...

Blockchain

Why do bitcoin futures break through the bitcoin bubble?

Text: Zhaosheng Source: Zero Finance In a recent interview, Christopher Giancarlo, former chairman of the US Commodit...