Israeli court ruled that bank policy should not arbitrarily close the account of Bitcoin Mining Company

Israeli court ruled that bank policy should not arbitrarily close the account of Bitcoin Mining Company

Translator: Play the coin family ElaineHu

An Israeli court ruled in favor of a bitcoin (BTC) mining company, after a local bank closed its account for money laundering. The Israeli daily business news agency Calcalist reported on this progress on March 17.

Israminers sued Igud (Union Bank of Israel Ltd.) in May 2018, which said the company had frozen its account in violation of anti-money laundering provisions, causing problems with its cash flow.

After a lengthy appeal process, a judge in the Tel Aviv District Court argued that the bank’s policy on cryptocurrency customers was too broad.

Calcalist quoted the judge, Limor Bibi, as saying: "I believe that this comprehensive policy that does not distinguish between different types of activities, scope of activities and different types of customers is unreasonable."

At the same time, however, Bibi said the bank has the right to reject deposits from cryptocurrency transactions.

This incident occurred because the regulator's regulatory policy on cryptocurrency transactions did not form a sound system. As Cointelegraph reports, many banks have objected to the services provided by companies and private investors who trade cryptocurrencies.

Often, this hostile position contradicts other activities of the same bank: for example, the UK-based Barclays also closed its account before establishing a partnership with the main cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase.

In the case of United Bank, executives seem to benefit from education in emerging industries. In November last year, local startup Bit2C held a seminar on how it works.

Earlier this month, a special committee of the Israeli Securities Regulatory Authority issued a final proposal to manage the cryptocurrency economy, which may make the bank's treatment more uniform in the future.

The attached report explains: "The committee recommends that consideration be given to adjusting the existing regulations to establish a more appropriate regulatory framework for this transaction to better cope with the risks posed by this activity."

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Hardcore PK Gold: What is the history of abandoned gold, what can it inspire Bitcoin? (under)

Do Bitcoin believers remember that Satoshi Nakamoto's vision in the white paper is to create a peer-to-peer elec...

Blockchain

Bitcoin position analysis: the collapse of the market, the characteristics of various accounts are obvious

On September 28th, CFTC announced the latest issue of CME Bitcoin Futures Weekly (September 18th – September 24...

Blockchain

MIT Technology Review: Can Photonic Chips "Save" Bitcoin?

Source: MIT Technology Review Compilation: First Class (First.VIP) Cryptocurrencies are known for their thirst for en...

Blockchain

Why can Bitcoin still rise after plunging again and again?

The original text was first published in Jianshu on February 4, 2020. The author is the founder and chief architect o...

Market

The gang is worth more than 20 million yuan for the purpose of digging bitcoin to steal electricity.

Recently, the reporter learned from the People's Procuratorate of Dantu District, Zhenjiang City that the instit...

Blockchain

Analysis: How does the halving of Litecoin become a good one?

Yesterday, Liteco successfully completed the halving of the four-year period, and the price has also risen, and every...