Should Polkadot’s market positioning and narrative be adjusted?

Adjust Polkadot's market positioning and narrative?

Dan Reecer shared his insights on the Polkadot forum after leaving Polkadot for several months, and proposed some ideas on Polkadot’s positioning and narrative in the market. His observations and analysis provide us with a new perspective, giving us the opportunity to re-examine the value and possibilities of Polkadot.

Dan believes that Polkadot’s positioning as an “interoperability solution” does not accurately grasp the main advantages that Polkadot brings to top-level blockchain development teams. This is because Polkadot only provides interoperability within Polkadot itself, while protocols like Axelar, LayerZero, and Wormhole have already accounted for the majority of transaction volume in achieving comprehensive encrypted interoperability. The interoperability within the Polkadot world can only play its advantages when there is significant user activity and transaction volume on multiple parachains in Polkadot.

He listed some examples of teams that recently chose chain development platforms:

BNB Chain just announced opBNB as an L2 chain for the OP Stack. Why did they do this? Because Optimism has motivation, users, liquidity, and is easy to build.

• The first debate of the Republican primary ended. Which candidates are friendly towards encryption?
• Wu’s Weekly Selection Tornado Cash Co-founder Arrested, HashKey to Open Retail Investors Next Week, and Top 10 News (0819-0825)
• Market Analysis There will be a sharp decline before the next rise, a bear market is approaching.

Frax just announced Frax Chain as an ETH L2. Why? They hope to obtain liquidity from the ETH mainnet. They did not launch on Polkadot because Polkadot does not have liquidity or users, and they do not need interoperability from Polkadot because it is only needed when other chains on Polkadot have value for interaction.

dYdX will launch a chain in the Cosmos ecosystem. They chose to do this because the Cosmos SDK provides them with flexibility, there are a certain number of powerful chains in the Cosmos ecosystem, Cosmos has motivation, and there is a certain amount of liquidity in Cosmos.

These chains choose their chain development stack not for the benefits of interoperability, but for the convenience of development/launch speed, liquidity/user base. Polkadot can provide all these technological advantages, and even surpass these competitors, but it really needs to address the liquidity/user issue. Therefore, he believes that Polkadot’s narrative and market positioning need to be adjusted to better attract and meet the needs of chain development teams.

Firstly, he believes that one of the main values that Polkadot can provide is its modularity and customizability. This is an advantage brought by Substrate technology, which allows development teams to adjust and modify flexibly according to their respective use cases. This flexibility not only simplifies the development process but also enables teams to better adapt to market demands and changes, thereby improving their competitiveness.

Secondly, Polkadot’s EVM compatibility is also an important advantage. Through this compatibility, any chain can be compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), thereby leveraging Ethereum’s rich application ecosystem and extensive user base. This compatibility not only brings more possibilities for development teams but also helps them gain market recognition faster.

In addition, the high security provided by Polkadot for its parachains is also one of its important values. Development teams using Polkadot do not need to set up their own validator sets, which reduces their burden and at the same time improves the security and stability of their chains.

Furthermore, from the perspective of regulatory compliance, Polkadot’s DOT token can also bring some advantages. Using DOT tokens as the operational tokens of the chain can help development teams better comply with relevant regulations and reduce the legal risks they face.

Lastly, as a pioneer in blockchain governance, the advantages of Polkadot in on-chain governance cannot be ignored. This advantage not only enhances the transparency and fairness of the platform but also helps development teams better manage and coordinate their projects.

To better illustrate these points, Dan shared an example of Polygon Supernets. The Polygon Supernets website clearly lists their advantages: “Polygon Supernets allows you to create high-performance, customizable application chains in a fast and seamless manner, with compliance implementation options.” This statement accurately captures the needs of developers and effectively conveys their advantages.

Returning to Polkadot, we can see that although its technology has been widely recognized, Polkadot still needs to make changes in terms of market positioning and narratives. Firstly, Polkadot needs to clarify and emphasize the main value it can provide, including modularity, security, regulatory compliance, and on-chain governance, among others. At the same time, Polkadot also needs to identify its own uniqueness to differentiate itself from other chain development platforms. This uniqueness may stem from its technological advantages or its deep understanding of developer needs.

Overall, Dan’s analysis and recommendations provide us with a new perspective to help us better understand the value and potential of Polkadot. By reexamining and adjusting its market positioning and narratives, the community hopes that Polkadot can stand out in the fiercely competitive blockchain market and gain more support from developers and users.

In fact, any technological product needs a clear and accurate market positioning to guide its development direction and meet user needs. For Polkadot, its positioning should not only accurately reflect its technological advantages but also fully consider the needs of developers and users. This is a complex and ongoing process that is also an important direction for the future development of Polkadot.

In this process, Polkadot not only needs to accurately identify and address the needs of developers and users but also needs to maintain sensitivity to market dynamics in order to timely adjust its market positioning and narratives. At the same time, Polkadot also needs to continue to optimize and enhance its technology to ensure that its technological advantages can be combined with market demands to create greater value. We look forward to Polkadot achieving greater success with a new face and winning more support!

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!