Ethereum's anti-ASIC algorithm ProgPoW received $50,000 support and is about to begin third-party code review

Hudson Jameson, the core developer of the Ethereum Foundation, announced that third-party review funding for the ProgPoW code is in place. ProgPoW is a controversial change to the Ethereum network. Jameson announced the news at the Ethereum Core Developers Conference on April 26.

Etherum

Jameson explained in a blog post in March that the review aimed to study "the impact of ProgPoW on the safety of Ethereum" and the impact of mining on Ethereum. The review will be handled by Berlin-based Least Authority, which was previously employed by Electric Coin (the company behind Zcash).

In the meeting, Jameson said:

The ProgPow review will receive financial support… it should start this week or next week.

Ethereum developers have been working hard since February to raise the necessary funds for this code review (50,000 DAI, about $50,000). These funds were raised through the open source donation platform Gitcoin, along with some anonymous donations from the cryptocurrency community.

Since the introduction of ProgPoW, it has been questioned – once successfully deployed, this code improvement has made it difficult for high-cost and specialized hardware to capture mining revenue from the Ethereum network.

Specifically, ProgPoW will severely limit ASIC miners, and the return of Ethereum miners using such miners will be greatly reduced.

The purpose of deploying this new code is to create a level playing field. After all, some miners cannot afford expensive mining equipment.

After the algorithm is updated, the Ethereum miners who use low-cost graphics cards will get more simple mining rewards, which is good news for miners without advanced equipment. However, the Ethereum mining reward competition will become more and more The more intense.

Can Ethereum successfully deploy ProgPoW to resist ASIC mining? Can ProgPoW really create a fair mining environment? What do you think?

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Alameda Research's $200M Blow A Tale of Phishing Attacks and Poor Security Practices, as Confessed by Ex-FTX Engineer

Aditya Baradwaj has revealed that a file containing blockchain private keys and exchange API keys was left vulnerable...

Blockchain

Viewpoint | Exchange is the public chain platform

If 2019 is almost a stand-alone platform currency, let me think about " What is value capture? " and "...

Blockchain

Starting to decentralize the game platform: Is it a good day to break the monopoly?

On May 31 , Xiao Xiao invited the founding partner of Xingyao Capital, Liu Jiang, founder of Xingheng Education, Chen...

Blockchain

The real life of the owner of the exchange: the horror of the thief, the night can not linger

Xu Mingxing once dreamed that someone had kidnapped him and asked him to hand over Bitcoin. Awakened in his dream, he...

Blockchain

Understanding the role of different roles in cryptocurrency exchanges

Originally written by Shane Molidor, Head of Global Business Development at BitMax & GDM, compiled by the Bluemou...

Blockchain

Will FTX liquidating $3.4 billion worth of crypto assets become the main culprit behind the market crash?

For FTX's legal team, this week will be a busy one as they seek regulatory approval to liquidate $3.4 billion worth o...