Telegram "force majeure" clause or activated, no need to refund funds due to postponement of network release

Telegram promises that if its blockchain network is delayed, it will return funds to investors, a commitment that may be cancelled due to the “force majeure” clause in the purchase agreement.

The Russian media the Bell pointed out in a report yesterday that the force majeure clause includes not only natural disasters, terrorist threats and war outbreaks, but also legal or regulatory actions of the relevant authorities.

Telegram

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this week announced that the Telegram Open Network (TON) ICO worth $1.7 billion is illegal, which could mean that even if Telegram is delayed, it does not need to return funds to investors.

In the purchase agreement leaked in February this year, Telegram pointed out that once TON's native token Gram could not be launched as scheduled on October 31, as long as the relevant participants did not make additional rules, the token contract would be considered invalid and the investor would A cancellation fee was received in US dollars.

In addition to this commitment, the Force Majeure clause states that Telegram “does not need to be responsible to the purchaser for failure or delay (mainline) if:”

"…(d) applicable laws or regulations; (e) actions of government authorities."

In February 2018, the founder of Telegram submitted a "Notice of Issuance of Securities Issues" (also known as Form D) to the SEC for the first round of the company's release, followed by a second such submission in March. Notice.

This exemption rule used by Telegram requires that tokens can only be sold to qualified investors.

However, the SEC is acting on the company because it fears that once these qualified investors get Gram, they will sell billions of tokens to ordinary investors on the open market.

According to reports, TON developers said in a letter to investors that they are evaluating the best way to respond to SEC actions, including but not limited to delaying the launch date of the network, considering the interests of the participants. they said:

"We were surprised and disappointed that the SEC chose to file a lawsuit in this situation. We disagree with the SEC's legal position."

In addition to announcing the illegality of its token issuance, the SEC also issued a temporary restraining order for the issuance of the Gram token. The court hearing will be held on October 24.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Exchanges are temporarily withdrawing cash, data is garbled, or the Amazon server failure in Tokyo

According to Yahoo Japan, the Amazon Web service failed at around 13:00 on August 23, 2019. The service that failed w...

Blockchain

Why is the bitcoin trading volume of Korean first-tier exchanges difficult to recover?

Source: LongHash As the country with the third-largest crypto exchange in daily trading volume (after the United Stat...

Blockchain

The volatility product "Turtle Bunny Card" is available, is the coin derivative a devil or an angel?

On May 30th, Dr. George Cao, founder and CEO of BitMax.io, visited the ChainNode live room and talked to Babbitt edit...

Market

Layout for many years but little known? Exploring the full picture and opportunities of the Japanese Web3 encryption market

What is the current situation of the Japanese cryptocurrency market? Who are the key participants? How can one partic...

Blockchain

FTX Bankruptcy Estate Bets Big $150 Million SOL and ETH on the Line as Sam Bankman-Fried's Trial Unfolds

It seems that addresses associated with the insolvent cryptocurrency exchange, which is currently being managed by a ...

Blockchain

Unveiling SBF's Defense Draft of up to 250 Pages I Did What I Believe Was Right

SBF traced his development journey, from his childhood in Palo Alto to the top floor apartment he purchased near the ...