Telegram "force majeure" clause or activated, no need to refund funds due to postponement of network release

Telegram promises that if its blockchain network is delayed, it will return funds to investors, a commitment that may be cancelled due to the “force majeure” clause in the purchase agreement.

The Russian media the Bell pointed out in a report yesterday that the force majeure clause includes not only natural disasters, terrorist threats and war outbreaks, but also legal or regulatory actions of the relevant authorities.

Telegram

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this week announced that the Telegram Open Network (TON) ICO worth $1.7 billion is illegal, which could mean that even if Telegram is delayed, it does not need to return funds to investors.

In the purchase agreement leaked in February this year, Telegram pointed out that once TON's native token Gram could not be launched as scheduled on October 31, as long as the relevant participants did not make additional rules, the token contract would be considered invalid and the investor would A cancellation fee was received in US dollars.

In addition to this commitment, the Force Majeure clause states that Telegram “does not need to be responsible to the purchaser for failure or delay (mainline) if:”

"…(d) applicable laws or regulations; (e) actions of government authorities."

In February 2018, the founder of Telegram submitted a "Notice of Issuance of Securities Issues" (also known as Form D) to the SEC for the first round of the company's release, followed by a second such submission in March. Notice.

This exemption rule used by Telegram requires that tokens can only be sold to qualified investors.

However, the SEC is acting on the company because it fears that once these qualified investors get Gram, they will sell billions of tokens to ordinary investors on the open market.

According to reports, TON developers said in a letter to investors that they are evaluating the best way to respond to SEC actions, including but not limited to delaying the launch date of the network, considering the interests of the participants. they said:

"We were surprised and disappointed that the SEC chose to file a lawsuit in this situation. We disagree with the SEC's legal position."

In addition to announcing the illegality of its token issuance, the SEC also issued a temporary restraining order for the issuance of the Gram token. The court hearing will be held on October 24.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

The Digital Currency in the Eyes of Economists - The Exchange: The Glory of the King

Digital Currency in the Eyes of Economists: Series Preface The digital currency in the eyes of economists – Cla...

Blockchain

Interview with Justin Sun: Web3 Yu'ebao stUSDT, Tron's Ambition to Connect DeFi and TradFi

stUSDT allows users to access low-risk and stable investment opportunities in national bonds, and supports flexible w...

Blockchain

Witness history! Bitcoin plunges sentient beings: mining circle under pressure, exchange shuffled

Author: Liu four red Source: BBT Fintech Circle Editor's Note: This article has been deleted without altering th...

Blockchain

Will NOVA be the next Pepe? Analysis from the perspective of trading techniques.

"Ten years of speculation in cryptocurrency can all be in vain, but a successful gamble on meme can make you live in ...

Blockchain

User information is not guaranteed? UK Customs and Excise Department asks cryptocurrency exchanges for transaction data

According to Coindesk's August 7 report, the UK tax authority, the HMRC, is putting pressure on cryptocurrency e...

Blockchain

After FCoin's "incident", key figures from the team responded!

On the evening of February 12, an announcement on the FCoin Exchange regarding "the latest progress of system ma...