Opinion The true and complete Telegram Bots experience will appear on Ton.

The full Telegram Bots experience will be available on Ton.

Author: jerry.ton, Source: Author’s twitter @0xRunchen

Overnight, the entire Chinese-language media was discussing Telegram Bots. As one of the few builders in the Chinese community on Ton, I would like to briefly discuss this topic.

Telegram is becoming a super app like WeChat, but it is more open than WeChat, which is something to be happy about. In the future, we will definitely see more and more scenarios on Telegram bots, and it is not an exaggeration to say that everything we see on WeChat will also be seen on Telegram. These ecosystems will create a flywheel, exponentially increasing user stickiness and time consumption on Telegram.

The bots we see now do not truly leverage Telegram’s capabilities; they simply move traditional web-based interactions to mobile. This logic is similar to the transition from the internet to mobile internet, and then from apps to mini-programs. But in the blue ocean stage, this is enough.

Telegram’s core capabilities in the crypto field will not be open to Ethereum. The wallet solutions we currently see only include custody and calling Metamask, neither of which are optimal solutions. The most direct core capability, built-in wallets and APIs, will only be provided to its own Ton.

A truly complete Telegram Bots experience will appear on Ton. The current bots experience is incomplete because they do not have the ability to access users’ assets (not your private key, not your assets), and this is exactly the problem we expect Ton to solve. The Ton wallet built into Telegram is already in the testing phase, and some people (including myself) have already seen demos. This is the real complete experience of Bots, where users interact with bots, initiate requests, access wallets, and complete transactions smoothly.

It is easier for high-frequency to compete with low-frequency than for low-frequency to compete with high-frequency. As a super high-frequency scenario, it is much easier for social platforms to encroach into the financial scene than for financial platforms to integrate social features. Don’t believe it? Think about Alipay’s efforts to compete with WeChat on the social front, do you still remember the “Lifestyle Circle” that was involved in a pornography scandal?

Instead of expecting Ethereum to create a decentralized social platform, it is better to bet on Ton, which is building a decentralized financial layer on Telegram.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Life After the Collapse of Sanjian Capital: Surfing, Meditation, and World Travel for the Founders

When their hedge fund failed, the entire industry collapsed. The resulting crisis drained the savings of millions of ...

Blockchain

Ieo, which used to be ten times easier, is there anyone else involved?

At the beginning of the new year, the coin opened the curtain of the IEO "issuing the first exchange" stage...

Blockchain

IEO re-burns the ring of rich dreams, how long can the dozens of income myths go?

There is no doubt that IEO is the hottest word in the currency. Since January 3 this year, the company announced the ...

Blockchain

Unveiling SBF's Defense Draft of up to 250 Pages I Did What I Believe Was Right

SBF traced his development journey, from his childhood in Palo Alto to the top floor apartment he purchased near the ...

Opinion

Amazon's participation and the skyrocketing value of AI company Anthropic become FTX's biggest hope of repaying the debt?

FTX previously invested $500 million as a lead investor in Anthropic's Series B financing round, so the expected appr...

Opinion

a16z evaluates the regulation of Web3 in the United States The regulatory situation is much more optimistic

This article analyzes and rates cases involving Coinbase, Uniswap, ZeroEx, OPYN, and Deridex, and finds that the regu...