3 NFT markets restrict ‘Stoner Cats’ transactions after SEC takes action

3 NFT markets restrict 'Stoner Cats' transactions after SEC intervention

Author: Mike Dalton, CryptoSlate; Translation: Song Xue, LianGuai

As of September 18th, at least three non-fungible token (NFT) marketplaces have limited the trading of the cartoon NFT series Stoner Cats.

The project was the brainchild of actress Mila Kunis, who also provided the voice for one of the characters in the accompanying animated web series.

Each marketplace has taken a different approach to restrict Stoner Cats. OpenSea and Blur continue to display the series, but each website prevents transactions by hiding listings and offers under each NFT page.

An OpenSea spokesperson confirmed that Stoner Cats cannot be bought, sold, or transferred on the platform, but stated that the series has not been delisted or removed.

Meanwhile, Rarible has hidden the entire collection of Stoner Cats. The website states that the collection has been “removed from public view.” Rarible’s page assures users that they still own the related items; like most NFTs, these items can freely circulate on the blockchain or be traded on other compatible marketplaces.

Another report by Decrypt quotes Rarible as saying that they have blocked access to Stoner Cats “based on its market monitoring of recent events.”

Regulations and trading fluctuations at play

Regulatory actions may be a direct or indirect factor behind each delisting. On September 13th, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Stoner Cats’ parent company with violations of securities regulations and announced a $1 million settlement.

These actions also coincide with sudden trading fluctuations. According to DappRadar data, Stoner Cats’ daily trading volume surged from close to zero to over $6,000 and $11,000 on September 12th and 13th, respectively, before dropping back to near zero. The current floor price is $96, more than three times higher than at the end of August and the beginning of September.

These unsustainable trends – rather than any perceived legal risks – may have prompted each marketplace to restrict trading. However, no marketplace has provided sufficient reasons for their decisions, and any reasons are ultimately speculative.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Dry goods | Three technical analysis methods to play the Bitcoin market cycle

Source: OKEx Compilation: First Class (First.VIP)   This article will share three technical analysis methods, an...

Blockchain

New survey: 36% of U.S. small businesses accept virtual currency payments

According to a Btcmanager report on January 16, a recent HSB survey showed that at least one-third of new small busin...

Blockchain

The annual salary is 1.4 US dollars, and the fixed bitcoin will make the Twitter CEO satisfied.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's salary last year was only $1.40, but you don't have to regret him. His bitcoin ha...

Blockchain

A paper on the role and advantages of Bitcoin in institutional portfolios

On Wednesday, investment management company VanEck released a report on the Investment Case for Bitcoin for investors...

Blockchain

Don't know lightning network? Zero-based can also be read by professional interpretation

In January of this year, the Bitcoin Lightning Network launched a “Torch Pass” experiment, which quickl...

Blockchain

Mining companies: Bitcoin mining is basically not affected by the epidemic, and the price is the most worrying

Recently, some large mining companies in the world said that Bitcoin mining activities are basically not affected by ...