I handed him 600 bitcoins, and he committed suicide last week.

In October 2018, Chen Lin, the owner of a bitcoin mine, gave a total of 600 BTCs to an investment platform called Biti.

In addition to the introduction of friends, Chen Lin originally intended to cast 600 BTCs because the founder of Bite, Hui Yi, is a successful continuous entrepreneur and investor. Hui has twice established a P2P company and escaped from the P2P explosion. It also earned hundreds of millions of profits. It also escaped from the stock market when the A shares reached 5,000 points, and it has the title of "Hui Shen". Bite also said that it has obtained the A-round strategic investment of Softbank China Capital.

However, on June 10th of this week, Chen Lin felt shocked by a rapid spread of news: Biti founder Hui Yi was killed on the 5th of June because he was smashed by 2000 BTCs. He was only 42 years old.

"He is dead, what should I do with my money?" After seeing this news, Chen Lin hurriedly tried to prove this in Bitwell's investor group and contacted Bitcom customer service. At this time, he discovered that the whole Bitcom was empty. In less than a week after Huixi committed suicide, the original Biti employees and partners also clarified the relationship.

• Exclusive dialogue V God! Where is the Ethereum Road under question?
• Bakkt is starting to blow up again, will BTC pick up the market again?
• Defi's core values, development logic and key trends

I handed him 600 bitcoins, and he committed suicide last week! Chen Lin told the block to block the BlockBeats. With the fermentation of Huiyu's suicide, things became more and more confusing. Not only did their own money get back hopeless, but they also rolled up a wave of death and thunder.

The main doubts that the outside world believes are that there is no conclusive evidence to prove that Bit is prone to futures bursting 2000BTC; BitEase is closely related to the recent P2P platform “Net Libao” which is involved in the case of over 3 billion yuan; the shareholder and employees are concerned about investment losses. Just don't mention it, clear up the responsibility.

Behind this suspicious suicide, there are several major doubts:

1. The circulation of the currency is that the direct cause of Huiyu’s suicide is the loss of 2000 BTC in futures. However, there is no conclusive evidence to confirm the futures exploding 2000BTC. 2. Some investors believe that in the absence of police records and death notices, it is believed that Huiyu’s suicide is hidden. Does not rule out the possibility of swindling and killing.

3. The P2P circle is circulated that Bitco is closely related to the P2P platform “Net Libao” which has recently involved more than RMB 3 billion and has exploded. Bitcoy took on the task of “Net Treasures” to transfer assets, transfer out of the country, and transfuse blood.

4. Some employees said that their attendance and salary are all linked to “Net Libao”, and there is a lot of overlap between the management of the two companies. Zhao Lilong, CEO of Netcom, had previously been in the company group of Bite, and he was under the control of the police earlier this year.

5, people can die to die? Biti founder committed suicide, and the company's other shareholders have opened up the relationship, not to mention the user's assets, and did not give a reasonable solution to the user's assets.

BTC is being opened? What about user assets?

"You have to understand that before Hui’s suicide, his label in the industry was Huishen. We did not promise to make a profit. The investors handed over the money to Biti, which is the product of trusting Hui and Bitcom."

Wang Zhi was born in August 2018. Before he left in February 2019, he signed more than 30 non-institutional small and medium-sized customers, with about 70 BTCs.

Wang Zhi also confirmed that the Bitcoin funds reported by the Star Daily reported mainly from institutional users. "Bityi has been raising funds from institutions. Before that, Tokenmania had funds here. The retailers raised small heads. "

Wang Zhi also told the block to block BlockBeats. He had always thought that Softbank actually invested in Bite, and it was only after the accident that Huimin had known that Softbank had not made a payment. Softbank China also issued a statement on June 11 stating the investment relationship between Minqing and Bitcom.

However, there is still no reliable source to confirm the profit and loss situation of Huiyi. With the claim that Huixi committed suicide and lost 2000 BTCs, investors' money is really likely to have not fallen.

An Anhui investor who signed the contract with Wang Zhi gave BlockBeats a block of the "Entrusted Management Agreement" with Biti, which stated that the agreement was not a guarantee for the security of the entrusted assets, and did not indicate that it was managed. Make a substantial judgment or guarantee of value.

The investor also said that he had already reported the police in the local area, but the police did not file a case, and he will report to Beijing in the future. In a Bitcoin investor rights group, some of the investments also revealed concerns about the ability to defend rights. Since digital currency trading is not clearly defined by law in China, all kinds of investment and wealth management in the currency circle have always been black-box operations, and they dare not get the bright surface. At present, Bitco's investors have not successfully accepted the case.

Involved in 3 billion P2P explosions

Mine owner Chen Lin told the block to block BlockBeats. Only a few friends and customers he knew invested in more than 1,500 BTCs and invested 600BTC.

Chen Lin estimates that Bitco has at least 3,000 BTCs of user assets, which is consistent with the amount of 3,000 BTCs reported by another media interview on the 9th floor.

"For the 3000 BTC suicide value? This is no reconciliation!" Chen Lin and his friends believe that without seeing the police record and the death notice, it is impossible to conclude that Hui Yu really committed suicide. In addition, I did not see the change in the balance of the BTC address and the record of the operation of the exchange. It was even more difficult to conclude that the investor’s assets had all been lost.

In terms of motivation, Huiyi did not need to commit suicide for 3,000 BTCs (about 160 million yuan). As two entrepreneurs who have successfully established P2P companies and successfully retired hundreds of millions of dollars, even if they lose 3,000 BTCs, they can afford it. There is no need to die.

This can only show that the cause of Huiyi’s suicide must have been involved in a more violent incident than the 3000BTC, which made him unable to bear . The biggest possibility is the P2P platform "Net Libao", which has recently involved more than 3 billion yuan. According to a screenshot that is widely spread but the source is unknown, Bite is accused of taking on the task of “net treasure” to transfer assets and transfer out of the country.

Former employee Wang Zhi told block block BeatBeats that the actual controller of "Net Libao" was also in the group of Bitcom. The attendance and salary of some employees are linked to "Net Treasures". Zhao Runlong and some NetLibao executives were arrested for explosives at the beginning of this year, involving more than 40,000 investors, involving a total amount of 3 billion yuan.

Prior to this, Bitcom has been giving blood to the net treasure, that is, NetLee financed BTC through Bitcoin, and then exchanged the French currency for the blood transfusion. In addition, BitEasy and Netcom have a lot of overlap at the management and shareholder level. Huiyi is the largest shareholder of Bite, accounting for 46.93% of the shares; among other shareholders, Li Chao accounted for 32.85%; Gan Jiahui accounted for 6.13%.

According to the employees of Biti, the shareholder Gan Jiahui is the younger brother of Gan Jiafeng and has close ties with Zhao Runlong. In fact, it is the shareholding of Zhao Runlong. At the same time, Li Chao was the second-in-command of "Net Li Bao". After the "Net Li Bao" thunder, he had fled to the United States.

Clearing these relationships, we can't see that there is a bigger case of thundering behind Hui Hui's suicide. The two major shareholders behind Bitcom, Zhao Runlong, have been arrested, Li Chao has fled, and Huiyi will face a situation?

Employee shareholders don’t mention investment losses

The original source of information about Huiyu’s suicide was a message from the EMABA student of Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business and the former Bitcom partner Zhang Wei on WeChat. According to the news, Hui Wei committed suicide in a self-proclaimed manner in the new office of Biti in the early morning of June 5. When the employee came to work at 10 o'clock, he was unable to return to the sky.

Then the police arrived at the video that was taken in the office. The video showed that Huiyi was returning to the company at 6 pm on June 4th. At that time, the employee had already got off work, and then the video showed that Ms. Zhang Wei came to the office with another shareholder. The individual talked for a while in Huiyi, and finally Huiyi sent the two away. A few hours later, Hui Yu committed suicide in the office.

As for what the three people talked about in the Huiyi office, no one knows.

At present, we are seeing that the original office of the Bitcom team has been emptied, but the new office is deliberately not disclosed. The partners and working employees also stopped their external contacts and did not respond to any interviews. We can only see voices such as the mourning committee in the media.

The funds invested by the investors themselves have been lost, but no one has claimed this responsibility. After Huiyi committed suicide, Bitcom's partners and related teams all lost their voices and did not respond to the outside world. The friends of BitEase employees have all closed and are not open to the public. A large number of investors complained that they could not get in touch in the community. Some investors said that "one can't be contacted, and all lose contact."

An investor who invested in hundreds of bitcoins in Bite also revealed that other shareholders of Bite are clearing their relationship with Huiyi. He said that "it is really chilling for the deceased and chilling investors. The practice is not the same, and Bitman’s shareholder and staff are more annoying.”

In the circle of friends, he said in his circle of friends, "For those who have already lost, there is still a sense of responsibility. It is precisely because this sense of responsibility cannot bear to choose to escape, and the living person I have to use this escape to cover up the truth, but Heaven is watching."

A closer look reveals that the whereabouts of the user assets of the Bitco founder suicide 3000BTC is unknown, and there are many similar doubts about the accidental death of the founder of the QuadrigaCX exchange, $147 million.

At the beginning of this year, the QuadrigaCX exchange was destroyed by the founder Cotten's accidental death of the private key, resulting in the inability to access the cold wallet, and the $147 million user funds "dead reconciliation" could not be taken out, which caused a lot of doubts.

Many institutions and investors have found that the exchange's cold wallet private key has not been lost or has multiple signatures; his partner was a swindler who was imprisoned; the founder Cotten's death certificate may have been forged by a local hospital in India; Cotten died The death was announced only a month later, and the time of death was doubtful.

At present, the Bitcom partners and related teams have all lost their voices. Only when one asset is exploding, they will not explain more about the user assets. Bitco has a close shareholding relationship with NetLibao, and its major shareholders have been arrested and fleeing.

Hui's police records and death certificates are not currently publicly visible. According to informed sources, Hui Yi committed suicide on June 5. The former partner Zhang Wei had already learned about the death of Hui Yu and disclosed it to the big customers, but the secret was still unrecognizable. It was not until June 10 that the matter began to ferment. Investors know that it is doubtful at the time of the announcement of the death.

In fact, quelling this incident is actually very simple. Shareholders and current executives quickly disclose the operating records and balances of client assets to investors and then develop compensation or liquidation plans. rest in peace.

(Chen Lin and Wang Zhi are the names of the respondents)

* Block Rhythm BlockBeats prompts investors to guard against high risk.

Source: Block Rhythm BlockBeats

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!