SEC’s Terraform ruling provides implications for handling the Coinbase case

SEC's Terraform ruling impacts Coinbase case handling.

Author: JESSE COGHLAN, COINTELEGRAPH; Translation: Song Xue, LianGuai

The recent filing submitted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the lawsuit against cryptocurrency miner Green United may reveal how it handles the case against Coinbase.

On July 31, District Judge Jed Rakoff denied Terraform Lab’s motion to dismiss the case, rejecting its argument based on the “materiality” principle, and SEC subsequently won the case.

The so-called cryptocurrency miner Green United also used the same argument in its motion to dismiss and this is also the core argument of the cryptocurrency defendant in the case against SEC, including the case from cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase.

However, in the filing submitted on August 4, SEC stated that the recent ruling by Terraform Labs provided additional authority to reject Green United’s arguments on materiality and fair notice defense.

The SEC’s letter stated, “The court rejected defendants’ argument that the ‘materiality’ and ‘due process’ provisions prevent the SEC from charging the company’s digital assets as ‘investment contracts’.”

“Therefore, Terraform Labs is relevant to this matter as it provides additional authority to reject defendants’ arguments on materiality and fair notice,” it added.

The SEC’s latest arguments may reveal how it handles Coinbase’s own motion to dismiss, which was also submitted on August 4.

In Coinbase’s motion to dismiss the SEC lawsuit, the cryptocurrency exchange argued that the SEC applied the materiality principle when attempting to regulate the secondary market for cryptocurrency transactions.

The materiality principle was established in a Supreme Court ruling in 2022, outlining that Congress intends to make policy decisions and not delegate authority to agencies — whose regulatory powers require explicit authorization from the legislature.

The judge in the SEC v. Terraform case argued that Terraform “cannot wield principles intended to apply in exceptional circumstances as a tool to undermine the routine work Congress expected the SEC and other administrative agencies to perform.”

The SEC has previously relied on other rulings in similar cases to support its arguments.

In April of this year, it sent a letter to the presiding judge in the SEC v. Ripple Labs case, emphasizing the judge’s choice in its successful litigation, which is considered a longstanding court precedent providing sufficient fair notice.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Korean or Korean? Bittrex Dreams New York

In June 2015, the New York Financial Services Department (NYDFS) became the first pioneer to develop a regulatory fra...

Market

Fortune Magazine From ambitious to defensive, what twists and turns has the crypto queen Katie Haun experienced?

Cryptocurrencies may experience cyclical fluctuations, but this time the trough is much steeper than investors expect...

Blockchain

Exchange Rollover Records: A Article Seeing 64 Rollover Accidents Since 2018

Editor's Note: The original title was "Exchange Overturn" Source: Tokenin Users using a centralized ex...

News

A picture to understand the blockchain: expansion, going to sea, ending, a decade of exchange history

Expansion, going to sea, ending-ten years history of exchanges On November 14, the Central Bank's Shanghai Headq...

Blockchain

Central Bank Shanghai Headquarters issued a document: increase supervision and prevention, and combat virtual currency transactions

Source: People's Bank of China Shanghai Headquarters official website In recent years, speculations related to v...

Blockchain

Long text: the change of the encrypted asset exchange and the risk challenge

Encrypted asset exchanges, like traditional exchanges, are products that develop to a certain period of time. With th...