Exploring ERC-4626: Tokenized Vault Standard

ERC-4626: Tokenized Vault Standard Exploration

ERC-4626 is a new standard for tokenized vaults in DeFi, which is crucial for yield aggregators, lending markets, collateralized derivatives, and more. In this article, Zellic researcher Sina Pilehchiha delves into how ERC-4626 simplifies integration and promotes robust implementation through standardization, as well as achieving safer cross-protocol interactions, just like ERC-20.

Tokenized vault is a common pattern in DeFi, and many dApps such as yield aggregators, lending markets, and collateralized derivatives rely on it, such as Yearn and Balancer. Through tokenized vaults, protocols can enhance liquidity and flexibility, trade and use assets across DeFi platforms, and create diversified and interrelated financial products, i.e. “money Legos.” However, without proper adaptability or standardized composability, it not only makes it difficult for developers to comply with industry standards, but also confuses new developers, and makes it difficult to review new changes and verify integrated implementation details.

ERC-4626 is proposed to address the above issues. ERC-4626 is a standard that improves the technical parameters of yield vaults, providing a standard API for tokenized yield vaults representing individual underlying ERC-20 token shares. By providing a unified standard for projects, ERC-4626 accelerates cross-protocol integration. Standardization is also easier for developers to understand, which reduces the possibility of coding errors and prevents composability issues. Standardization can also prevent redundant work and help avoid common design flaws. ERC-4626 also allows DeFi players to adopt a more secure and robust vault standard, reducing the attack surface that protocols need to cover when integrating tokens across multiple protocols.

Using a new protocol always requires trade-offs, and when integrating tokenized vaults into smart contracts, potential pitfalls should be carefully considered. Potential security risks of ERC-4626 include: managing feeOnTransfer tokens, correctly using decimals variables, rounding, paying out what is not (necessarily) received, overriding core functionality, zero-share cases, vaults as price oracles, implementation-specific issues, EOA direct access, vault extensions, and so on. These potential attack vectors are the most discussed issues around the ERC-4626 standard. As adoption increases, we will certainly explore the implementation and integration of ERC-4626 vaults from more perspectives.

Reference: https://www.zellic.io/blog/exploring-erc-4626

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

PAData: FCoin potential victims or more than 2000 people, per capita loss or more than 25 BTC

Analyst | Carol Editor | Bi Tongtong Production | PANews Data Partner | Chain.info On February 17, the FCoin, which w...

Opinion

Interview with She Knows|Exclusive dialogue network project TOP Network, Fetch.AI, IEO will continue to fire?

On April 2nd, the second season of Babit's first-community interactive interview column, She Knows, was launched...

Market

Old-timers Leaving the Crypto Circle Some Get Married and Have Children, Some Start New Businesses

In the world of encryption, people come and go. Have you ever wondered where the people who have left the cryptocurre...

Blockchain

Extreme market challenges major contract exchanges, BTCC contract performance is outstanding

On Friday, Bitcoin ushered in three surges in a short period of time, with a gain of more than 20%. The currency circ...

Market

The ultimate way out of cryptocurrency exchanges: decentralization (below)

The full text is brief: Alicoin|Exclusive view With the endless stream of asset security cases such as hacking and se...

Blockchain

Comment: The exchange is open finance

Foreword: In the current encryption world, exchanges are the biggest catchers of value. Because of the user's de...