Exploring ERC-4626: Tokenized Vault Standard

ERC-4626: Tokenized Vault Standard Exploration

ERC-4626 is a new standard for tokenized vaults in DeFi, which is crucial for yield aggregators, lending markets, collateralized derivatives, and more. In this article, Zellic researcher Sina Pilehchiha delves into how ERC-4626 simplifies integration and promotes robust implementation through standardization, as well as achieving safer cross-protocol interactions, just like ERC-20.

Tokenized vault is a common pattern in DeFi, and many dApps such as yield aggregators, lending markets, and collateralized derivatives rely on it, such as Yearn and Balancer. Through tokenized vaults, protocols can enhance liquidity and flexibility, trade and use assets across DeFi platforms, and create diversified and interrelated financial products, i.e. “money Legos.” However, without proper adaptability or standardized composability, it not only makes it difficult for developers to comply with industry standards, but also confuses new developers, and makes it difficult to review new changes and verify integrated implementation details.

ERC-4626 is proposed to address the above issues. ERC-4626 is a standard that improves the technical parameters of yield vaults, providing a standard API for tokenized yield vaults representing individual underlying ERC-20 token shares. By providing a unified standard for projects, ERC-4626 accelerates cross-protocol integration. Standardization is also easier for developers to understand, which reduces the possibility of coding errors and prevents composability issues. Standardization can also prevent redundant work and help avoid common design flaws. ERC-4626 also allows DeFi players to adopt a more secure and robust vault standard, reducing the attack surface that protocols need to cover when integrating tokens across multiple protocols.

Using a new protocol always requires trade-offs, and when integrating tokenized vaults into smart contracts, potential pitfalls should be carefully considered. Potential security risks of ERC-4626 include: managing feeOnTransfer tokens, correctly using decimals variables, rounding, paying out what is not (necessarily) received, overriding core functionality, zero-share cases, vaults as price oracles, implementation-specific issues, EOA direct access, vault extensions, and so on. These potential attack vectors are the most discussed issues around the ERC-4626 standard. As adoption increases, we will certainly explore the implementation and integration of ERC-4626 vaults from more perspectives.

Reference: https://www.zellic.io/blog/exploring-erc-4626

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Analysis: How does the value chain of the blockchain industry work?

Over the past few years, blockchain technology has evolved from a purely technology to a multi-billion dollar industr...

Blockchain

DeSpread Research Data Analysis of Centralized Exchanges and Investor Behavior in South Korea

According to a survey by the Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (KoFIU), it is expected that the number of cryptocurre...

Opinion

Overview of International Cryptocurrency Regulatory Agencies

We have studied 45 countries, including G20 member countries, as well as countries with the highest adoption rate of ...

Blockchain

Xiaoyan follow-up: CZ, Nathan Kaiser, ten "big coffee" in the same box, market, trading, technology, all the nets

The Asian Block Summit was held in Taipei on July 2nd and 3rd. The summit focused on “blockchain business ...