Exploring ERC-4626: Tokenized Vault Standard

ERC-4626: Tokenized Vault Standard Exploration

ERC-4626 is a new standard for tokenized vaults in DeFi, which is crucial for yield aggregators, lending markets, collateralized derivatives, and more. In this article, Zellic researcher Sina Pilehchiha delves into how ERC-4626 simplifies integration and promotes robust implementation through standardization, as well as achieving safer cross-protocol interactions, just like ERC-20.

Tokenized vault is a common pattern in DeFi, and many dApps such as yield aggregators, lending markets, and collateralized derivatives rely on it, such as Yearn and Balancer. Through tokenized vaults, protocols can enhance liquidity and flexibility, trade and use assets across DeFi platforms, and create diversified and interrelated financial products, i.e. “money Legos.” However, without proper adaptability or standardized composability, it not only makes it difficult for developers to comply with industry standards, but also confuses new developers, and makes it difficult to review new changes and verify integrated implementation details.

ERC-4626 is proposed to address the above issues. ERC-4626 is a standard that improves the technical parameters of yield vaults, providing a standard API for tokenized yield vaults representing individual underlying ERC-20 token shares. By providing a unified standard for projects, ERC-4626 accelerates cross-protocol integration. Standardization is also easier for developers to understand, which reduces the possibility of coding errors and prevents composability issues. Standardization can also prevent redundant work and help avoid common design flaws. ERC-4626 also allows DeFi players to adopt a more secure and robust vault standard, reducing the attack surface that protocols need to cover when integrating tokens across multiple protocols.

Using a new protocol always requires trade-offs, and when integrating tokenized vaults into smart contracts, potential pitfalls should be carefully considered. Potential security risks of ERC-4626 include: managing feeOnTransfer tokens, correctly using decimals variables, rounding, paying out what is not (necessarily) received, overriding core functionality, zero-share cases, vaults as price oracles, implementation-specific issues, EOA direct access, vault extensions, and so on. These potential attack vectors are the most discussed issues around the ERC-4626 standard. As adoption increases, we will certainly explore the implementation and integration of ERC-4626 vaults from more perspectives.

Reference: https://www.zellic.io/blog/exploring-erc-4626

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Life After the Collapse of Sanjian Capital: Surfing, Meditation, and World Travel for the Founders

When their hedge fund failed, the entire industry collapsed. The resulting crisis drained the savings of millions of ...

Blockchain

Exchange Rollover Records: A Article Seeing 64 Rollover Accidents Since 2018

Editor's Note: The original title was "Exchange Overturn" Source: Tokenin Users using a centralized ex...

Blockchain

Fake foreign exchange platform to enter the currency circle: reverse shouting, tampering with data, investors become the biggest victims

After the spread of money and funds, there has been a new routine in the currency circle – a false exchange. Pu...

Blockchain

The history of the rise and fall of the exchange: an important silhouette of the development of blockchain

Original from: blog.nomics.com Author: Nathaniel Whittemore & Clay Collins Compilation: Orange Book There may be ...

Blockchain

Hong Kong Cryptocurrency New Policy's One-Year Anniversary A Year of Major Leaps and Key Milestone Review

Over the past year, Hong Kong has made great progress and shown strategic development in virtual asset policies. Sinc...

Blockchain

ChainNode Live Room | Derivatives track has become an industry consensus. Bitcoin will be up to $ 20,000 in the year?

Since the beginning of this year, the trading platform has frequently acted, causing one after another "destruct...