Reserve Bank of New Zealand: Cryptocurrencies “do not currently require regulatory measures”

Reserve Bank of New Zealand: No need for crypto regulation at present

Author: JESSE COGHLAN, COINTELEGRAPH; Translation: Matsumi, Blocking

After public submissions, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand is stepping up its monitoring of stablecoins and crypto assets, but not calling for regulatory action.

Ian Woolford, director of currency and cash at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, said in a statement on June 30 that the bank agreed that “there is no need for regulatory action at this stage but vigilance is needed.”

Woolford’s statement came with a summary of a paper discussing crypto and decentralized finance submitted by 50 stakeholders to the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

Interviewees included the country’s cryptocurrency advocacy group BlockchainNZ, tech company Ripple, and banks such as Bank of the West Pacific and the Bank of New Zealand.

Woolford said the submissions showed “significant risks and opportunities” in cryptocurrency and that the industry’s development was “uncertain,” making it necessary to pay extra attention:

“We agree that caution is required, which reinforces the need for increased data and monitoring to build understanding.”

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand appears to be waiting to see how other jurisdictions regulate crypto before taking action.

“Global coordination is crucial to ensuring effective regulation,” Woolford added, noting that with the implementation of overseas regimes, best regulatory practices may become clearer.

New Zealand ranks 108th out of 146 countries in the 2022 Chainalysis report on global cryptocurrency adoption, just behind Austria and ahead of Azerbaijan.

The index ranks all countries according to “grassroots cryptocurrency adoption rates.” Data source: Chainalysis

Current New Zealand law considers cryptocurrency a form of property. Digital assets are governed by a variety of generally applicable financial, anti-money laundering, and tax regulations that are not specific to cryptocurrency.

“Issues arising from crypto assets and other innovations are not entirely within the scope of an institution,” Woolford said.

He added that if the country wants to create a “reliable and efficient currency and payment system,” consumer and investor protection as well as regulatory barriers to entry are indeed important.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

New Battlefield for Encrypted Exchanges: High Frequency Trading

Some cryptocurrency exchanges are "quietly" paving the red carpet for High-Frequency Trading, and many trad...

Blockchain

Three major domestic virtual currency exchanges focus on compliance business and actively engage with local governments and state-owned enterprises

China Times (www.chinatimes.net.cn) reporter Ran Xuedong trainee reporter An Lingfei Beijing reports The currency cir...

Bitcoin

Restoring the entire process of asset transfer: $6.02 million stolen from the DragonEX exchange

In the early morning of March 24th, Beijing time, the DragonEX exchange issued a notice stating that its platform dig...

Blockchain

Full text of South Korea's first independent "Encryption Act": Insider trading carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

On June 30, 2023, the South Korean National Assembly's Political Affairs Committee passed the country's first legisla...

Blockchain

Korean or Korean? Bittrex Dreams New York

In June 2015, the New York Financial Services Department (NYDFS) became the first pioneer to develop a regulatory fra...

Blockchain

Read the article Bakkt: cryptocurrency of the New York Stock Exchange

At the Bakkt Digital Assets Summit held last week at the New York Stock Exchange, more than 150 investors around the ...