1confirmation Partner: Reflections on the Crypto VC Landscape in the Bear Market
1confirmation Partner: Thoughts on Crypto VC Landscape in Bear Market1confirmation partner Richard Chen shared some insights from his conversations over the past few months with LPs and other general partners about the state of crypto VC. Unfortunately, he noted that in the bear market, it has become increasingly common for VCs to retract term sheets and demand refunds from invested companies.
1) Most funds with high TVPI (Total Value to Paid-In Capital) have low DPI (Distributed Paid-In Capital): this is the famous “VC Ponzi scheme” described by Chamath, where funds show their book profits to LPs to raise large amounts of capital and earn hefty management fees. 2) Most funds from 2017-18 have lower DPI than a16z crypto Fund I’s DPI: I can’t share exact figures, but a16z’s ability to multiply the fund size is very impressive. 3) One year funds in the 2021 bull market are among the worst performing funds: a one year fund refers to a fund that rapidly raises and deploys all funds within a year, and then raises the next fund in the second year. 2021 was particularly bad for cryptocurrency venture capital, with seed rounds completed at crazy valuations of over $50 million before product launch, with risk/reward being meaningless. In addition, early investors are forced to exercise their equity on a pro-rata basis to maintain their ownership percentage before seeing any meaningful product traction, leading to deployment of venture capital at a faster pace than expected, and raising the next round of funds from LPs faster than expected.
4) It’s either small seed funds or large index funds, the middle ground is a no-man’s-land: fund size is often a legitimate signal of competition for venture capital firms. Seed funds that raised larger funds without constraints on fund size during a bull market are currently in the middle ground, where the size is too large to get any upside in seed fund investments, and too small to become a well-known brand. They can’t raise funds of such size again in the short term, and reducing the fund size would lower management fees. 5) Unfortunately, in bear markets, VC clawback provisions and requests for refunds from invested companies are becoming increasingly common. So far, I have heard from founders and other investors that five famous cryptocurrency venture capital funds have done this. The worst offenders have done this to at least five different companies. I also notice that the more venture capital firms invest in their public image, the more they feel they can get away with such misconduct behind the scenes.
- Data Analysis of EigenLayer’s Second Round Deposit Progress
- Who is the winner in the XRP ruling?
- An Analysis of a16z’s Core Investment Philosophy: Focusing on Non-Consensus
Reference: https://www.techflowpost.com/article/detail_12475.html
We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!
Was this article helpful?
93 out of 132 found this helpful
Related articles
- Has the full-stack game engine MUD v2 abandoned the ECS architecture? Is ECS suitable for creating full-stack games?
- Coinbase’s Base releases mainnet for developers, aiming to launch publicly in August.
- Deep Analysis of MKR On-Chain Data: Slow Growth in Holding Addresses, Majority of Large Holders in Profitable Positions MKR On-Chain Data Analysis: Slow Growth in Holding Addresses, Majority of Large Holders in Profitable Positions
- Ripple wins brief legal victory, XRP token not a security?
- Ripple wins ruling that XRP is not a security
- Written on Binance’s 6th anniversary: Will there be a warm spring after the crypto winter?
- What makes Sound.xyz, the leading player in the music NFT field, attractive to a16z’s investment?