Decentralized Broker or Protocol? Analyzing the Two Paths to Build the Foundation of DeFi

Decentralized finance (DeFi) has two primary approaches for building its foundation: decentralized brokers and protocols. Decentralized brokers act as a middleman between buyers and sellers in a trustless manner and offer benefits such as liquidity, security, and accessibility. However, they also have drawbacks such as high fees and centralization. Protocols, on the other hand, create automated, trustless systems for exchanging assets and offer benefits such as low fees, decentralization, and flexibility. However, they can be complex to build and maintain and can be vulnerable to hacks and exploits. Ultimately, the choice between decentralized brokers and protocols will depend on the specific use case and the needs of users.

DeFi is still in its early stages, and builders are facing a major crossroads: choosing to build on a “decentralized broker” or a “protocol” as the foundation? Morpho Labs CEO Blockingul Frambot analyzes the characteristics of the two approaches and their current adoption status.

Decentralized Brokers are platforms similar to TradFi funds or brokers, but with on-chain infrastructure and decentralized governance. In short, they are custodial DeFi platforms. Typically, on-chain brokers follow two patterns: flexible, custodial, and product-oriented codebases, and reliance on economic and statistical models.

Protocols are trustless general financial primitives that lay the foundation for more layers to be built upon them. These protocols are mostly complete, as they can run correctly without external interaction. Typically, there are two main patterns to identify whether a DeFi platform is an actual protocol: trustless and general.

While most stablecoins, perpetual exchanges, or over-collateralized loan pools often adopt the decentralized broker model, the trend seems to lean towards the protocol approach. For stablecoins, Maker DAO’s ultimate goal is to externalize complexity outside of the core contract and emphasize the fairness of the currency it creates. For DEXs, fee tiers, price changes, and oracle functions are the only quantifiable parts retained in Uniswap V3, which are removed in V4. Throughout the DeFi landscape, it is evident that lending has always favored decentralized brokers, with no complete protocol dominating the scene.

Reference: https://morpho.mirror.xyz/KCMBXBYPOE-aYvPuu5vSVzUozoO98QqZsYHvx5TYz5c

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

The essence, risks and new opportunities of exchanges from the perspective of monetary finance

Why do you understand that the exchange must first understand the bank? Where are the new opportunities for the excha...

Blockchain

Contract exchange seeks compliance: as low as 1,500 knives for high NFA licenses

Editor's Note: This article has been deleted without changing the author's original intention. The number o...

Blockchain

Deep Dive into Uniswap V4: A "Masterpiece" of Decentralized Exchange

Updates to Uniswap V4 could further enhance its position in the DEX space, with the "hooks" feature greatly improving...

Blockchain

Gu Yanxi: The Governance Mechanism of the Future Encrypted Digital Asset Trading Industry

More and more encrypted digital asset exchanges have emerged in the US market recently. In addition to existing encry...

Blockchain

Clear out while the time is right? FTX and Alameda-related addresses recently transferred $30 million worth of assets.

In September, FTX was approved for liquidation and has been frequently withdrawing large amounts of assets in the pas...

Blockchain

The Digital Currency in the Eyes of Economists - The Exchange: The Glory of the King

Digital Currency in the Eyes of Economists: Series Preface The digital currency in the eyes of economists – Cla...