Decentralized Broker or Protocol? Analyzing the Two Paths to Build the Foundation of DeFiDecentralized finance (DeFi) has two primary approaches for building its foundation: decentralized brokers and protocols. Decentralized brokers act as a middleman between buyers and sellers in a trustless manner and offer benefits such as liquidity, security, and accessibility. However, they also have drawbacks such as high fees and centralization. Protocols, on the other hand, create automated, trustless systems for exchanging assets and offer benefits such as low fees, decentralization, and flexibility. However, they can be complex to build and maintain and can be vulnerable to hacks and exploits. Ultimately, the choice between decentralized brokers and protocols will depend on the specific use case and the needs of users.
DeFi is still in its early stages, and builders are facing a major crossroads: choosing to build on a “decentralized broker” or a “protocol” as the foundation? Morpho Labs CEO Blockingul Frambot analyzes the characteristics of the two approaches and their current adoption status.
Decentralized Brokers are platforms similar to TradFi funds or brokers, but with on-chain infrastructure and decentralized governance. In short, they are custodial DeFi platforms. Typically, on-chain brokers follow two patterns: flexible, custodial, and product-oriented codebases, and reliance on economic and statistical models.
Protocols are trustless general financial primitives that lay the foundation for more layers to be built upon them. These protocols are mostly complete, as they can run correctly without external interaction. Typically, there are two main patterns to identify whether a DeFi platform is an actual protocol: trustless and general.
- Field Investigation: The Darkest Hour Has Not Come, But NFT Will Not Die
- Interpreting the Latest Feature of Mirror – Collectable Embeds: Display, Spread, and Interact
- Decoding RWA: The Most Valuable Encryption Narrative in Compliance Context
While most stablecoins, perpetual exchanges, or over-collateralized loan pools often adopt the decentralized broker model, the trend seems to lean towards the protocol approach. For stablecoins, Maker DAO’s ultimate goal is to externalize complexity outside of the core contract and emphasize the fairness of the currency it creates. For DEXs, fee tiers, price changes, and oracle functions are the only quantifiable parts retained in Uniswap V3, which are removed in V4. Throughout the DeFi landscape, it is evident that lending has always favored decentralized brokers, with no complete protocol dominating the scene.
- Concerns arise over the association between TUSD and Prime Trust as issues with the minting and redemption system emerge.
- Guide to landing Web3.0 in Hong Kong Cyberport: How to receive a subsidy of 1.3 million and a free office?
- Guide to landing Web3.0 in Hong Kong Cyberport: How to obtain 1.3 million subsidies and a free office?
- Understanding Ethscriptions in one article: principles and advantages and disadvantages
- Delphi Digital: Polygon releases new vision, intertwining OP/ARB stack and cross-chain security
- Speculation about the development of NFTs in the next two years: 99.999% of old NFTs will tend towards zero value, and Grail NFTs have the opportunity to outperform ETH.
- Conversation with Qi Zhou, founder of EthStorage: Data Availability and Decentralized Storage