Time and patience are the scarcest resources for any brand.
Time and patience are essential, scarce resources for any brand.Time and patience are two of the most important resources in building a brand. Unfortunately, in web3, these are like luxury items among scarce resources. Cryptocurrency KOL Ruby Wang discusses the challenges of building a brand for PFP NFT projects based on the Azuki Elemental incident.
Summary of the main FUD reasons for the Elemental series release: 1) High expectations. In the past three quarters, Azuki has been one of the few pfp projects with stable and rising prices in the bear market. The Las Vegas event also raised everyone’s emotions and hype to a high point. 2) Announcement and expectation mismatch. The 2-minute animated short film released at the Follow The Rabbit event has high production quality, and the character style has some differentiation from the previous Azuki core series. Therefore, when Elemental was unveiled with a style so similar to the previous one, it caused a lot of shock among holders.
3) Dilution and total value reduction felt by OG Azuki holders. This is actually the most critical issue. The original total of 10K Azuki was positioned as high-end, and Elemental was released with 20K, and the middle human category is difficult to distinguish from the previous Azuki OG series. This to some extent lowers the threshold for new entrants to Azuki, and a price of around 2E can buy an avatar that was previously 10+E. 4) Technical execution flaws. This release not only had a short sale time (only 10 minutes for the first two stages), but also encountered website traffic limiting issues, causing some Azuki and BEANZ holders to be unable to mint Elemental during the first two stages.
- Did BCH triple in two weeks? Is the resurrection of PoW narrative just a dream?
- Exploring Whether LUSD Will Become the Best Choice in the Stablecoin Competition Landscape?
- Understanding ZeroLiquid: A Non-Liquidating Zero-Interest Lending Agreement Secured by LST
This Elemental release mishap actually exposes a problem that already exists: how can PFP NFTs surpass NFT projects in developing business? 1) Content development, by launching NFTs first, verifying IP stickiness and audience, and then iterating more extensive products and experiences, web3 IP provides higher capital efficiency compared to web2 IP. 2) Content distribution, if the NFT community is well-developed, it will be easier to gain disseminators than web2 IP. This is something that many web3 holders can easily feel. 3) Content production and profit distribution. The potential benefit brought by web3 is that contributors involved in content development can enjoy the brand’s upside, and participate in important decision-making governance through tokens and DAOs. Fans holding NFTs can also receive better product and service benefits.
Reference: https://www.web3brand.io/p/611
We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!
Was this article helpful?
93 out of 132 found this helpful
Related articles
- Development of Polkadot parallel threads has already begun. Learn how it works.
- Will the combination of the ZK and OP methods become the future of Ethereum Rollup?
- Has the PoW Narrative Renaissance become a dream as BCH tripled in two weeks?
- I have drawn over 100,000 robot images, and my Twitter avatar is full of these pictures. This AI painting competition is becoming very popular.
- The New Frontier of DeFi: the Rise of Repeated Collateralization, Liquidity Mining, and LSD Tokens
- The bankruptcy judge in the southern district of New York has approved Celsius’ exchange of altcoins for BTC and ETH starting from July 1st.
- Exclusive Interview with HashKey PRO: Has Reached Cooperation with Zhongan Bank, Currently Supporting SWIFT Bank Transfers in 16 Countries and Regions