Viewpoint | Is the BNB that Binance destroys every quarter really tied to profits?

Source: Planet Daily

Author: Azuma

On January 18, Binance officially announced the completion of BNB destruction in the fourth quarter of 2019. According to the Binance announcement, nearly 2.2 million BNBs (2216888 BNB) were destroyed this time, valued at approximately $ 38.8 million.

Given that Binance previously mentioned in the BNB white paper that the value of destroying BNB each quarter is 20% of the quarter's net profit, the data of "$ 38.8 million" has been interpreted by many market analysts as-Binance in 2019 In the fourth quarter of this year, it achieved a net profit of $ 194 million. But is this really the case?

The Block Research Director Larry Cermak tweeted today: "Few people know one thing-Binance revised its white paper last summer and the destruction of BNB is no longer based on quarterly net profit. All market analysis (Such as Arca, Messari) are inaccurate, but Zhao Changpeng is happy to forward these analyses. In fact, BNB's current quarterly destruction is based on Binance's transaction volume data. "

  • Odaily Planet Daily Note: Larry Cermak noted that the revision of the white paper occurred in the second quarter of 2019. According to the screenshots given, Binance did delete “20% of quarterly net profit will be used to repurchase BNB and destroy it” in the BNB destruction plan, and instead described it as “BNB's destruction will Volume data. "

Larry claimed that Zhao Changpeng told him at the time: "We have deleted the description of profit because some regions tend to associate profit with securities, and we want to separate BNB from securities. So next we plan to use this New ways to describe how BNB is destroyed. "

According to Zhao Changpeng's explanation, Binance modified BNB's destruction method due to regulatory considerations. However, the new method of destruction does not seem to be transparent enough. In Larry's original words, "They can burn whatever they want".

Larry pointed out that in Q4 2019, the value of BNB destroyed by Binance was the second highest since Q4 2017. This number is interesting, however, as the volume of BNB destruction data increased while the volume of transactions in the quarter actually decreased.

For example, for comparison, in Q2 2019, Binance destroyed a total of US $ 23.84 million worth of BNB, while the transaction volume in the same quarter was US $ 151.7 billion. In Q4 2019, Binance's trading volume decreased by 47%, but the value of BNB destroyed increased by more than 60%. The figure below calculates the ratio of Binance's destruction value to spot trading volume in each quarter of Binance, and the changes are obvious.

Some argue that the changes in the data can be attributed to the futures trading market that Binance has launched since. Larry Cermak explained that this theory is also not true.

"It's almost meaningless to compare spot trading volume with futures trading volume … Futures provide high leverage trading, which can be clearly seen in the trading volume. Most importantly, the transaction fee for futures trading is 3-4 times lower than spot trading. So It does not make sense to attribute the fluctuations in the above ratios to 'Binan earns more money from futures trading'. Spot transactions may still contribute more than 80% of Binance's revenue. The profit of Binance Q4 cannot be higher than Q2 . "

Larry concluded: "My theory is that Binance simply chose to destroy more BNB on its own. The more they destroy, the more headlines will be made, and the more people will think that Binance's performance in the fourth quarter is real Good. But if you look at all the data, you will find it impossible. "

"All exchanges struggled in the fourth quarter, and Binance is no exception. No matter how much BNB they destroy. Binance is a very successful company, but it is not as successful as people think."

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Opinion

a16z evaluates the regulation of Web3 in the United States The regulatory situation is much more optimistic

This article analyzes and rates cases involving Coinbase, Uniswap, ZeroEx, OPYN, and Deridex, and finds that the regu...

Blockchain

When the PoS gold rush era is opened, who will become the next bit continent?

background The first generation of cryptocurrency bitcoin, which brought the necessary changes to our world, and the ...

DeFi

Postponed Fraud Trial of Mango Markets Exploiter: A Delayed Showdown

Fashion executive, Avraham Eisenberg, accused of a $116 million fraud at Mango Market, will face trial on April 8, 20...

Blockchain

Interviewed 800 crypto traders in 75 countries around the world. What did they find?

"Traders look for simplicity, but the exchange can't meet it. 80% of participants have entered the market f...

Market

Wu's Weekly Picks: HSBC launches cryptocurrency ETF, US SEC rejects spot ETF application, Azuki criticized by community, and top 10 news (June 24-30)

Author | Wu's Top 100 Blockchain News This Week. US SEC Returns Spot ETF File According to WSJ, the US...

Blockchain

Viewpoint | Exchange is the public chain platform

If 2019 is almost a stand-alone platform currency, let me think about " What is value capture? " and "...