CFTC Chairman 70% of cryptocurrency products should be classified as commodities

CFTC Chairman 70% of crypto products should be commodities

Author: Jacob Oliver, CryptoSlate; Translation: Song Xue, LianGuai

Rostin Behnam, Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), emphasized the need to establish a clear regulatory framework in the booming cryptocurrency market during an interview with Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) podcast on August 14th.

Behnam expressed concerns about the current ambiguity in the industry and the vulnerability to potential fraud and manipulation, stating, “The market seems to need some sort of regulatory framework.”

These comments come at a time when institutional interest in cryptocurrencies is rising, with market participants seeking clarification. “You can predict that if there is a clear regulatory framework, institutional demand may increase,” he pointed out.

Commodities and Securities

Behnam has previously made extensive comments on the cryptocurrency field, most notably that many currencies, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, should be considered commodities.

However, this position is somewhat inconsistent with the stance of Gary Gensler, Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who has previously mentioned that the majority of cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities and therefore subject to existing securities laws. Behnam challenges this view, believing that about 70% of the cryptocurrency market products should be classified as commodities. He called on Congress to enact legislation to provide clearer guidance for commodity tokens and enhance the CFTC’s oversight of the industry.

This is not the first time the Chairman of the CFTC has weighed in on the cryptocurrency regulatory debate. In a hearing in March 2023, Behnam declared that digital assets such as Ethereum and certain stablecoins are commodities, challenging the broader classification of cryptocurrencies as securities by the SEC. The difference between the two regulatory agencies has long been a contentious issue and may continue to affect the regulatory landscape of the cryptocurrency industry.

Currently, as institutional and individual interest in the cryptocurrency market continues to exist, there is an increasing demand for clearer, more detailed, and comprehensive regulatory guidelines.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Opinion

Caroline Ellison testified in court Acting on the instructions of SBF, embezzlement of approximately $14 billion in FTX client funds.

The Manhattan courtroom was crowded on Tuesday as Caroline Ellison, the former girlfriend of SBF and former CEO of Al...

Blockchain

After carrying a huge debt and shutting down TradeBlock, the former crypto empire DCG is now struggling for survival with one arm.

As the liquidity crisis in encryption erupted, the market declined, and the previous blind expansion and investment h...

Opinion

Unveiling SBF's Defense Draft of up to 250 pages I did what I believed was right.

In the draft, SBF traced his development history, from his childhood in Palo Alto to the penthouse apartment he purch...

Blockchain

The coin was stolen for the first time, and the 7000BTC was missing.

On the morning of May 8, the world-renowned cryptocurrency exchange currency announced that the currency security was...

Blockchain

Hilariously Hot Crypto Drama: FTX and Genesis Global Trading Settle for a Cool $175 Million

Bankruptcy Court Approves $175 Million Settlement between Cryptocurrency Companies FTX and Genesis in New York