CFTC Chairman 70% of cryptocurrency products should be classified as commodities

CFTC Chairman 70% of crypto products should be commodities

Author: Jacob Oliver, CryptoSlate; Translation: Song Xue, LianGuai

Rostin Behnam, Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), emphasized the need to establish a clear regulatory framework in the booming cryptocurrency market during an interview with Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) podcast on August 14th.

Behnam expressed concerns about the current ambiguity in the industry and the vulnerability to potential fraud and manipulation, stating, “The market seems to need some sort of regulatory framework.”

These comments come at a time when institutional interest in cryptocurrencies is rising, with market participants seeking clarification. “You can predict that if there is a clear regulatory framework, institutional demand may increase,” he pointed out.

Commodities and Securities

Behnam has previously made extensive comments on the cryptocurrency field, most notably that many currencies, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, should be considered commodities.

However, this position is somewhat inconsistent with the stance of Gary Gensler, Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who has previously mentioned that the majority of cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities and therefore subject to existing securities laws. Behnam challenges this view, believing that about 70% of the cryptocurrency market products should be classified as commodities. He called on Congress to enact legislation to provide clearer guidance for commodity tokens and enhance the CFTC’s oversight of the industry.

This is not the first time the Chairman of the CFTC has weighed in on the cryptocurrency regulatory debate. In a hearing in March 2023, Behnam declared that digital assets such as Ethereum and certain stablecoins are commodities, challenging the broader classification of cryptocurrencies as securities by the SEC. The difference between the two regulatory agencies has long been a contentious issue and may continue to affect the regulatory landscape of the cryptocurrency industry.

Currently, as institutional and individual interest in the cryptocurrency market continues to exist, there is an increasing demand for clearer, more detailed, and comprehensive regulatory guidelines.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Opinion

What do legal experts think of the SBF trial?

If SBF is convicted of one or more charges he is facing, the length of time he will spend in prison will largely depe...

Blockchain

Latest updates on regulatory events: CZ releases internal memo, Gensler criticizes two exchanges again.

According to Gensler, his agency has obtained internal communications that allegedly indicate intentional illegal beh...

Blockchain

FCoin latest progress: Zhang Jian announces wallet address, defenders confront Zhang Jian's family, Hangzhou police will not file a case

Since last night, a series of incidents have occurred in FCoin. First, Zhang Jian's wife, parents and sister wer...

Blockchain

Central Bank Shanghai Headquarters issued a document: increase supervision and prevention, and combat virtual currency transactions

Source: People's Bank of China Shanghai Headquarters official website In recent years, speculations related to v...

Blockchain

Dividends or repurchases: conspiracy and conspiracy of the exchanges

Today, there is a gap between the major exchanges such as the fire currency, the currency security, and the OK. The r...

Blockchain

Coinbase UK's 2018 net profit margin was 4.3%, up 2 points from 2017

Do you think Coinbase makes money? On April 18, according to Cindesk , according to Reuters speculation and calculati...