CFTC Chairman 70% of cryptocurrency products should be classified as commodities

CFTC Chairman 70% of crypto products should be commodities

Author: Jacob Oliver, CryptoSlate; Translation: Song Xue, LianGuai

Rostin Behnam, Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), emphasized the need to establish a clear regulatory framework in the booming cryptocurrency market during an interview with Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) podcast on August 14th.

Behnam expressed concerns about the current ambiguity in the industry and the vulnerability to potential fraud and manipulation, stating, “The market seems to need some sort of regulatory framework.”

These comments come at a time when institutional interest in cryptocurrencies is rising, with market participants seeking clarification. “You can predict that if there is a clear regulatory framework, institutional demand may increase,” he pointed out.

Commodities and Securities

Behnam has previously made extensive comments on the cryptocurrency field, most notably that many currencies, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, should be considered commodities.

However, this position is somewhat inconsistent with the stance of Gary Gensler, Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who has previously mentioned that the majority of cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities and therefore subject to existing securities laws. Behnam challenges this view, believing that about 70% of the cryptocurrency market products should be classified as commodities. He called on Congress to enact legislation to provide clearer guidance for commodity tokens and enhance the CFTC’s oversight of the industry.

This is not the first time the Chairman of the CFTC has weighed in on the cryptocurrency regulatory debate. In a hearing in March 2023, Behnam declared that digital assets such as Ethereum and certain stablecoins are commodities, challenging the broader classification of cryptocurrencies as securities by the SEC. The difference between the two regulatory agencies has long been a contentious issue and may continue to affect the regulatory landscape of the cryptocurrency industry.

Currently, as institutional and individual interest in the cryptocurrency market continues to exist, there is an increasing demand for clearer, more detailed, and comprehensive regulatory guidelines.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Opinion

One year after the FTX crash, have the once badly affected market makers in the crypto world recovered?

Alameda Research is the core trading company of Sam Bankman-Fried's failed crypto empire, and after the company's col...

Blockchain

IEO re-burns the ring of rich dreams, how long can the dozens of income myths go?

There is no doubt that IEO is the hottest word in the currency. Since January 3 this year, the company announced the ...

Blockchain

The real life of the owner of the exchange: the horror of the thief, the night can not linger

Xu Mingxing once dreamed that someone had kidnapped him and asked him to hand over Bitcoin. Awakened in his dream, he...

Market

Is CoinDesk selling at a loss with a valuation of $125 million after being in business for ten years?

On the occasion of its tenth anniversary and after being held by DCG Group for eight years, CoinDesk, the cryptocurre...

Blockchain

ChainNode Live Room | Derivatives track has become an industry consensus. Bitcoin will be up to $ 20,000 in the year?

Since the beginning of this year, the trading platform has frequently acted, causing one after another "destruct...

Blockchain

Exchange pushes Singapore into compliance

Text: 嚯 嚯 Source: Hive Finance On March 27, the Singapore Financial Regulatory Authority (MAS) official...