Viewpoint: Regarding the fees and free options in Ordinals, in the long run, they are actually the same.

Viewpoint: Ordinals' fees and free options are effectively the same in the long run.

Encrypt KOL wrote a recommendation sharing their observations and insights on Ordinals. They believe that in the long run, the distinction between paid and free content in Ordinals, including Bitcoin NFT and BRC20, is actually the same.

Opinion: In the long run, charging and free are actually the same. Bitcoin NFT is permanently stored and there is no royalty, so artists and developers need incentives. There are two ways to bring revenue to artists. One is to directly charge for Bitcoin NFT, so that artists and developers can directly benefit and use it to develop the ecosystem and create better products. This is a more direct form. The second is for artists or developers to reserve a portion for future sales. This is already mentioned in the handbook on the Ordinals website and is not unethical.

Advantages and disadvantages of direct charging: 1) The advantage is that it directly incentivizes the project party and can be used to maintain market and development promotion work. Artists have less pressure. The project price is not 0, and there is already a consensus floor price. 2) The disadvantage is that it may increase the cost for early participants, and this form of direct charging may not be easily accepted intuitively.

Free, reserved for later sale: 1) The advantage is that the cost for the first batch of participants is low, and it is easy to be accepted and promoted. 2) The disadvantage is that the reserved portion thrown out later will cause a greater impact on the market. After the project party sells it, it may abandon the original project because the free project party has no responsibility for long-term maintenance. Therefore, for a long-term project, the overall impact of direct charging and free is almost the same. Only the time period and emphasis are different. In addition, there is the intervention of mining fees, so the cost of free is not completely free. Therefore, charging is not necessarily expensive, and free is not necessarily attractive.

Reference: https://twitter.com/ohxiyu/status/1662674051750576128

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Market

Banks Join Forces to Transform Cross-Border Transactions

Fashion-forward global banks, Deutsche Bank and Standard Chartered, are leading the way in a revolutionary solution t...

Blockchain

Solana Mobile Plans to Unleash a More Affordable Crypto Smartphone

Solana Mobile has an exciting plan to greatly decrease the price of their smartphone, making it even more competitive...

Blockchain

Sam Bankman-Fried: The King of Crypto Faces Judgment Day

Sam Bankman-Fried, the fashion entrepreneur accused of fraud and criminal conspiracy, has been convicted with all sev...

Web3

Trust Wallet, a Web3 company, achieves historic feat by becoming the first to obtain global privacy certifications.

Trust Wallet has made history as the first company to obtain international certifications for both security and priva...

Blockchain

Blobs Launch on Gnosis Chain ahead of Ethereum's London Upgrade.

Gnosis Chain is taking a significant step in enhancing its ecosystem by integrating blobs. This strategic move also l...

Bitcoin

RFK Jr. and Trump Share Similar Stance on US CBDC

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a candidate who has shown progressive thinking by accepting BTC for his campaign, has made a b...