Viewpoint: Regarding the fees and free options in Ordinals, in the long run, they are actually the same.

Viewpoint: Ordinals' fees and free options are effectively the same in the long run.

Encrypt KOL wrote a recommendation sharing their observations and insights on Ordinals. They believe that in the long run, the distinction between paid and free content in Ordinals, including Bitcoin NFT and BRC20, is actually the same.

Opinion: In the long run, charging and free are actually the same. Bitcoin NFT is permanently stored and there is no royalty, so artists and developers need incentives. There are two ways to bring revenue to artists. One is to directly charge for Bitcoin NFT, so that artists and developers can directly benefit and use it to develop the ecosystem and create better products. This is a more direct form. The second is for artists or developers to reserve a portion for future sales. This is already mentioned in the handbook on the Ordinals website and is not unethical.

Advantages and disadvantages of direct charging: 1) The advantage is that it directly incentivizes the project party and can be used to maintain market and development promotion work. Artists have less pressure. The project price is not 0, and there is already a consensus floor price. 2) The disadvantage is that it may increase the cost for early participants, and this form of direct charging may not be easily accepted intuitively.

Free, reserved for later sale: 1) The advantage is that the cost for the first batch of participants is low, and it is easy to be accepted and promoted. 2) The disadvantage is that the reserved portion thrown out later will cause a greater impact on the market. After the project party sells it, it may abandon the original project because the free project party has no responsibility for long-term maintenance. Therefore, for a long-term project, the overall impact of direct charging and free is almost the same. Only the time period and emphasis are different. In addition, there is the intervention of mining fees, so the cost of free is not completely free. Therefore, charging is not necessarily expensive, and free is not necessarily attractive.

Reference: https://twitter.com/ohxiyu/status/1662674051750576128

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Market

Fortune Magazine From ambitious to defensive, what twists and turns has the crypto queen Katie Haun experienced?

Cryptocurrencies may experience cyclical fluctuations, but this time the trough is much steeper than investors expect...

Policy

Babbitt Column | US Prosecution Investigative Exchange and Precautions

(For more details, see also Deng Jianpeng, Sun Penglei: “Intermediary Chain Supervision and Compliance Respons...

Market

Exploring the evolution of the stablecoin market structure: Why can USDT always dominate the first place?

Stablecoin competition is an endless topic, as the industry struggles in its second decade, hoping that the market ca...

Blockchain

A picture proves that there are a large number of cleaning transactions on the exchange

In order to more accurately depict trading activity, the "Real 10" indicator only considers the volume of t...

Blockchain

Bitcoin for $0.32, they dreamed back to 2009 today

On August 23, 2019, the history of cryptocurrencies may remember this day. In the normal market price of Bitcoin was ...

Blockchain

From Caroline Ellison to Gary Wang The Fate of Bankman-Fried Hangs by a Thread, According to Bloomberg

Three ex-close friends and colleagues of FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried have testified against him, possibly result...