SEC’s encryption regulation B-side: The Fantastic Story of Prometheus Exchange

SEC's encryption regulation and the story of Prometheus Exchange

Author: NingNing, independent analyst. Source: Author’s Twitter NingNing @0xNing0x

A cryptocurrency exchange incubated by Chinese capital (Wanxiang Blockchain, Hashkey); an exchange whose core team members are mainly former employees of SEC and FINRA; a shell exchange that has had no actual business operations since its establishment in 2017 – it is the Prometheus Exchange.

However, it has ambitions to monopolize cryptocurrency trading in the United States and has caused a big stir in the U.S. cryptocurrency circle these days.

Here’s what happened: Recently, the SEC launched a new round of intensive regulatory actions against the cryptocurrency industry in the name of protecting investors, including suing Binance and Coinbase and defining tokens such as $SOL, $MATIC, and $ADA as securities. But at this moment, the CEO of Prometheus Exchange, Aron Kaplan, appeared in a congressional hearing on the cryptocurrency industry with a pre-prepared cheat sheet, answering questions from Democratic lawmakers and putting on a good show. Their goal was to try to convince members of Congress and the public that tokens defined by the SEC as securities should only be traded on licensed and compliant securities-type token exchanges (ATS), which currently means they can only be traded on the Prometheus Exchange.

This makes the SEC’s regulatory actions look a bit suspect: from a righteous act to protect cryptocurrency investors, it seems more like clearing out competitors for the Prometheus Exchange and engaging in interest transfers. As a result, a “scraping movement” against the Prometheus Exchange has erupted in the U.S. cryptocurrency circle these days. Only when you scrape do you know, and when you scrape, you get scared. The black materials of the Prometheus Exchange mentioned at the beginning have been exposed one after another.

However, the Prometheus Exchange has ignored the criticism from the U.S. cryptocurrency circle and only tweeted on June 13 as a side response. The tweet said: “There is a path forward for U.S. digital assets, which is to use the existing regulatory framework established by the U.S. Federal Securities Act.”

To translate it: Don’t expect to enact new laws specifically for digital assets/cryptocurrencies. Learn from me and apply for compliance licenses from SEC and FINRA. Of course, you won’t get the license.

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Market

Multiple macroeconomic negative factors have hit the market, causing Bitcoin to drop below 26,000 US dollars in the short term.

24-hour bitcoin price analysis chart shows that bitcoin is in a strong downtrend, with bears dominating the market.

Opinion

What happened during the first week of the SBF case in a comprehensive article?

In the first week of the trial, SBF found itself in a difficult situation with almost all the testimonies and public ...

Blockchain

Why is the bitcoin trading volume of Korean first-tier exchanges difficult to recover?

Source: LongHash As the country with the third-largest crypto exchange in daily trading volume (after the United Stat...

Blockchain

After FCoin's "incident", key figures from the team responded!

On the evening of February 12, an announcement on the FCoin Exchange regarding "the latest progress of system ma...

Policy

FTX Hacker Strikes Again - This Time with Style!

The 72,000 ETH stolen from FTX last year has resurfaced for the first time since the hack, as transactions have emerg...

Blockchain

Exchange Real Volume Report (on) | TokenInsight

Summary of points: 1. According to the report, 36% of the exchanges (11) have a real trading volume ratio higher than...