Analysis of the Massive Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not Simply a Hack, Nor Loss of Complete Control due to Uncontrollable Factors

Analysis of the Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not a Hack or Complete Loss of Control

Researcher 0xLoki wrote an article on the characteristics of the large-scale abnormal outflow of Multichain tokens, and made deductions based on these characteristics. They believe that this event is more likely due to some uncontrollable factors resulting in loss of complete control, rather than a simple attack. In addition, 0xLoki also stated that MPC itself is not the problem, but rather the issue lies with a natural person who is in possession of a shard exceeding the threshold, and is located in a jurisdiction where cryptocurrency activities are banned or not protected.

Several characteristics: 1) The duration of asset transfer is quite long, indicating that the transferor is not in a hurry; 2) A small test of 2 USDC was conducted before the asset transfer, and 2U was also transferred, indicating that the transferor has sustainable transfer capacity; 3) Each asset was transferred to an independent wallet, and no further action was taken afterwards (such as transfer to an exchange, swap, or mixing); 4) The receiving wallet is completely clean, without even any gas.

Inferred information based on these characteristics: 1) The transferor has sufficient time. Considering the technical characteristics of MPC, the transferor may have obtained complete control over the private key shards exceeding the threshold in some way; 2) The attack method is very simple, just a simple transfer operation, without contract, and with testing, the attacker is most likely not a hacker; 3) The operator did not further dispose of or cash out the transferred assets, and may not have absolute decision-making power.

What will happen next: 1) The assets controlled by Multichain MPC multisignature are no longer under control. Correspondingly, if the holders of other MPC or multisignature shards exceeding the threshold hold those uncontrolled shards, all of these assets and contracts may also be out of control; 2) See what the receiving address will do.

Reference: https://twitter.com/Loki_Zeng/status/1677133369149390849

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Bitcoin

Beware! FTX Users Targeted in Hilarious Yet Insidious Withdrawal Scam

Fashionista alert Reports of FTX users falling victim to phishing scam through enticing emails and withdrawals.

Blockchain

SBF Trial Week 3 Former FTX Head of Engineering Nishad Singh appears in court, confesses to embezzling user funds for political donations.

With the appearance of former FTX Engineering Director Nishad Singh, the third week of SBF's trial has begun. Singh's...

Blockchain

Inside story How FTX stays up all night to prevent a $1 billion cryptocurrency theft case

On the same day FTX announced bankruptcy, someone began stealing hundreds of millions of dollars from its vault. An i...

Market

Chainlink: Reaching New Heights and Oracle Superpowers

In October, LINK's price has exhibited impressive strength. What could have caused this surge?

Blockchain

Exchanges are temporarily withdrawing cash, data is garbled, or the Amazon server failure in Tokyo

According to Yahoo Japan, the Amazon Web service failed at around 13:00 on August 23, 2019. The service that failed w...

Blockchain

Xiaoyan follow-up: CZ, Nathan Kaiser, ten "big coffee" in the same box, market, trading, technology, all the nets

The Asian Block Summit was held in Taipei on July 2nd and 3rd. The summit focused on “blockchain business ...