Analysis of the Massive Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not Simply a Hack, Nor Loss of Complete Control due to Uncontrollable Factors

Analysis of the Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not a Hack or Complete Loss of Control

Researcher 0xLoki wrote an article on the characteristics of the large-scale abnormal outflow of Multichain tokens, and made deductions based on these characteristics. They believe that this event is more likely due to some uncontrollable factors resulting in loss of complete control, rather than a simple attack. In addition, 0xLoki also stated that MPC itself is not the problem, but rather the issue lies with a natural person who is in possession of a shard exceeding the threshold, and is located in a jurisdiction where cryptocurrency activities are banned or not protected.

Several characteristics: 1) The duration of asset transfer is quite long, indicating that the transferor is not in a hurry; 2) A small test of 2 USDC was conducted before the asset transfer, and 2U was also transferred, indicating that the transferor has sustainable transfer capacity; 3) Each asset was transferred to an independent wallet, and no further action was taken afterwards (such as transfer to an exchange, swap, or mixing); 4) The receiving wallet is completely clean, without even any gas.

Inferred information based on these characteristics: 1) The transferor has sufficient time. Considering the technical characteristics of MPC, the transferor may have obtained complete control over the private key shards exceeding the threshold in some way; 2) The attack method is very simple, just a simple transfer operation, without contract, and with testing, the attacker is most likely not a hacker; 3) The operator did not further dispose of or cash out the transferred assets, and may not have absolute decision-making power.

What will happen next: 1) The assets controlled by Multichain MPC multisignature are no longer under control. Correspondingly, if the holders of other MPC or multisignature shards exceeding the threshold hold those uncontrolled shards, all of these assets and contracts may also be out of control; 2) See what the receiving address will do.

Reference: https://twitter.com/Loki_Zeng/status/1677133369149390849

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

The essence, risks and new opportunities of exchanges from the perspective of monetary finance

Why do you understand that the exchange must first understand the bank? Where are the new opportunities for the excha...

News

SBF in the eyes of Western mainstream media Watch the BBC documentary 'The Fall of the Crypto King' in 5 minutes.

FTX, a former giant in the cryptocurrency world, collided with an iceberg in November last year. This impact triggere...

Blockchain

ChainNode Live Room | Derivatives track has become an industry consensus. Bitcoin will be up to $ 20,000 in the year?

Since the beginning of this year, the trading platform has frequently acted, causing one after another "destruct...

Blockchain

Bloomberg: The currency stability exchange's own stable currency will be issued in "weeks to one or two months"

According to Bloomberg News, Wei Zhou, chief financial officer of Binance, the main cryptocurrency exchange, said in ...

Blockchain

The history of the rise and fall of the exchange: an important silhouette of the development of blockchain

Original from: blog.nomics.com Author: Nathaniel Whittemore & Clay Collins Compilation: Orange Book There may be ...

Blockchain

A number of exchanges will openly call the FATF proposal at the G20 opening meeting

The G20 summit of the G20, which everyone is paying attention to, will be held on June 28 and 29, 2019 in Osaka, Japa...