Analysis of the Massive Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not Simply a Hack, Nor Loss of Complete Control due to Uncontrollable Factors

Analysis of the Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not a Hack or Complete Loss of Control

Researcher 0xLoki wrote an article on the characteristics of the large-scale abnormal outflow of Multichain tokens, and made deductions based on these characteristics. They believe that this event is more likely due to some uncontrollable factors resulting in loss of complete control, rather than a simple attack. In addition, 0xLoki also stated that MPC itself is not the problem, but rather the issue lies with a natural person who is in possession of a shard exceeding the threshold, and is located in a jurisdiction where cryptocurrency activities are banned or not protected.

Several characteristics: 1) The duration of asset transfer is quite long, indicating that the transferor is not in a hurry; 2) A small test of 2 USDC was conducted before the asset transfer, and 2U was also transferred, indicating that the transferor has sustainable transfer capacity; 3) Each asset was transferred to an independent wallet, and no further action was taken afterwards (such as transfer to an exchange, swap, or mixing); 4) The receiving wallet is completely clean, without even any gas.

Inferred information based on these characteristics: 1) The transferor has sufficient time. Considering the technical characteristics of MPC, the transferor may have obtained complete control over the private key shards exceeding the threshold in some way; 2) The attack method is very simple, just a simple transfer operation, without contract, and with testing, the attacker is most likely not a hacker; 3) The operator did not further dispose of or cash out the transferred assets, and may not have absolute decision-making power.

What will happen next: 1) The assets controlled by Multichain MPC multisignature are no longer under control. Correspondingly, if the holders of other MPC or multisignature shards exceeding the threshold hold those uncontrolled shards, all of these assets and contracts may also be out of control; 2) See what the receiving address will do.

Reference: https://twitter.com/Loki_Zeng/status/1677133369149390849

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

South Korea officially legalizes cryptocurrency transactions, Bitcoin stands at $ 9,000

The entire session of the National Assembly of South Korea passed an amendment to the "Reporting and Utilization...

Opinion

One year after the FTX crash, have the once badly affected market makers in the crypto world recovered?

Alameda Research is the core trading company of Sam Bankman-Fried's failed crypto empire, and after the company's col...

Blockchain

The head exchange spoiled, but who did not solve the Staking pain point?

It will seize more than 14% of the market share of the currency market, and the choice of the top 100 currencies of t...

Blockchain

The digital currency exchange has been caught in the throat by the legal currency.

Under the premise of a constant total circulation, money acts as a catalyst for rapidly transforming production mater...

Blockchain

Bitcoin's soaring population: the mining giant ushered in the spring exchange to die in the cold winter

After experiencing a downturn last year, the price of the world's largest digital cryptocurrency bitcoin began t...

Blockchain

Long text: the change of the encrypted asset exchange and the risk challenge

Encrypted asset exchanges, like traditional exchanges, are products that develop to a certain period of time. With th...