Analysis of the Massive Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not Simply a Hack, Nor Loss of Complete Control due to Uncontrollable Factors

Analysis of the Abnormal Outflow of Multichain Tokens: Not a Hack or Complete Loss of Control

Researcher 0xLoki wrote an article on the characteristics of the large-scale abnormal outflow of Multichain tokens, and made deductions based on these characteristics. They believe that this event is more likely due to some uncontrollable factors resulting in loss of complete control, rather than a simple attack. In addition, 0xLoki also stated that MPC itself is not the problem, but rather the issue lies with a natural person who is in possession of a shard exceeding the threshold, and is located in a jurisdiction where cryptocurrency activities are banned or not protected.

Several characteristics: 1) The duration of asset transfer is quite long, indicating that the transferor is not in a hurry; 2) A small test of 2 USDC was conducted before the asset transfer, and 2U was also transferred, indicating that the transferor has sustainable transfer capacity; 3) Each asset was transferred to an independent wallet, and no further action was taken afterwards (such as transfer to an exchange, swap, or mixing); 4) The receiving wallet is completely clean, without even any gas.

Inferred information based on these characteristics: 1) The transferor has sufficient time. Considering the technical characteristics of MPC, the transferor may have obtained complete control over the private key shards exceeding the threshold in some way; 2) The attack method is very simple, just a simple transfer operation, without contract, and with testing, the attacker is most likely not a hacker; 3) The operator did not further dispose of or cash out the transferred assets, and may not have absolute decision-making power.

What will happen next: 1) The assets controlled by Multichain MPC multisignature are no longer under control. Correspondingly, if the holders of other MPC or multisignature shards exceeding the threshold hold those uncontrolled shards, all of these assets and contracts may also be out of control; 2) See what the receiving address will do.

Reference: https://twitter.com/Loki_Zeng/status/1677133369149390849

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Solana Ecosystem Bounces Back from FTX Collapse with a Dash of Resilience and a Pinch of Silver Lining

Solana CEO, Anatoly Yakovenko, discusses the impact of FTX's downfall on Solana's ecosystem startups and projects.

Blockchain

Is an exchange losing $ 250 million in cryptocurrencies a Ponzi scheme: Quadriga Bizarre Story

Written by: Nathaniel Rich Translator: Zhan Juan Illustrator: Bianca Bagnarelli Original article published in Vanity ...

Blockchain

The cryptocurrency exchange "closed tide", running to catch up with P2P

The cryptocurrency exchange, once regarded as “stable and not paying”, is more crazy than other fields,...

Blockchain

Did Michael Lewis's reputation 'crash' by showing mercy to SBF?

Source New York Times Compiled by LianGuaiBitpushNews Mary Liu Hiking is a common interview format for Michael Lewis....

Blockchain

The wave of "absolute deflation" of platform currency is coming. How should the exchange make a choice?

This article Source: Odaily Daily Planet , author: the the Platform currency refers to tokens issued by digital asset...

Market

Is CoinDesk selling at a loss with a valuation of $125 million after being in business for ten years?

On the occasion of its tenth anniversary and after being held by DCG Group for eight years, CoinDesk, the cryptocurre...