Analysis of Binance’s new coin investment returns: What are the reasons behind the poor performance?

Analyzing Binance's underperforming coin investments

According to Binance’s listing announcement, during the 13-month period from April 2022 to June 2023, Binance added a total of 20 new tokens for spot trading, including 6 new coins and 14 old ones. The average return on investment for these 20 tokens since their listing is -22.3%, significantly lower than the average return of 7.9% for BTC during the same period. Cryptocurrency researcher 0xLoki analyzed the reasons for this issue and found that the overhype of the listing effect and the exhaustion of growth potential are the main reasons for the poor performance of newly listed tokens on Binance.

The average holding return of the 20 projects to date is -22.3%, significantly underperforming BTC’s average return of 7.9%; only ID, RPL, and LDO have returns that exceed BTC during the same period, while the remaining 17 have underperformed BTC over the same period, with RPL having the highest return rate above BTC (leading by 26%) and OSMO having the lowest (falling behind by 96.6%). In addition, considering the effect of listing on Binance, we use T+7 as the benchmark date for calculation, and the average return rate of the 20 projects is -11.3%, still lagging behind BTC’s average return rate (9.4%).

First of all, one thing we can be certain of is that the 14 old coins listed on Binance are fundamentally sound and have been market-tested, objectively speaking, they do belong to “high-quality coins”. Therefore, the reasons for this situation may be three-fold: the timing of listing was too late, Binance’s liquidity advantage became a dumping ground, and the “listing effect” overdrew the growth space. Based on this, we selected 14 old coins and calculated the return rate from the day Binance was listed to 7 days before the listing. It can be seen that Binance’s listing effect is very obvious, so the listing effect overdrawing the growth space is the main reason for the poor performance of Binance’s newly listed tokens.

From Binance’s perspective, according to a reasonable process, they have selected tokens with good fundamentals for listing. If the listing decision occurred before the listing or when Binance made the listing decision, buying the token, even extending the market cycle, would result in returns higher than the market average. However, from the user’s perspective, the reason for this problem is the “listing effect”, where a 35% increase erodes the token’s original potential for growth, which is a form of irrational or excessive investment.

Reference: https://mirror.xyz/lokiz.eth/mNjsF0vyxkpQwxwC88Yo61e-U1DTbw0ky4Gr51WhKto

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Market

Bitcoin ETFs See Strong Inflows as Bitcoin Bulls Charge Ahead 💪🚀

Bitcoin and several other altcoins have successfully surpassed their previous overhead resistance levels, demonstrati...

Market

Analysis and Commentary: The Fate of Bitcoin ETFs and Cryptocurrency Performance

After a period of significant growth in the crypto market, traders were briefly shaken by a report causing a halt in ...

Blockchain

Cardano's on-chain data indicates a potential surge in value. Could $10 be within reach?

Exciting bullish indicators emerging within the Cardano network indicate potential for a future surge in the value of...

News

Interpreting the Performance of 14 L1 Public Chains in Q1: Stacks Emerges as Dark Horse, Network Usage Rate Generally Decreases

After the running-in period, various public chains have entered the "internal competition" stage.

Bitcoin

Bitcoin Faces Resistance at $52,000, Possible Pullback Ahead

Altcoins have seen a slight decrease in value due to Bitcoin's hesitancy in maintaining a level above $52,000. Howeve...

Market

Bitcoin Hits $45,500 as Bulls Continue to Dominate

Bitcoin's strong price performance persists as it faces a crucial challenge to reach $45,000.