ERC4337: Trigger Transactions Autonomously Without Relying on External EOA Accounts

ERC4337: Autonomous Transaction Triggering Without External EOA Accounts

Digi researcher RyanCiz.eth discussed the possibility of enabling smart contracts to trigger transactions autonomously by modifying node and transaction structures after the proposal of the ERC-4337 standard.

After ERC4337, modifications to node and transaction structures will allow smart contracts to directly send transactions. In Ethereum’s previous design, EOA represented humans and CA (contract accounts) represented applications. Applications had to be triggered by EOA, making the design of many products tricky.

For example, in the case of loan liquidation, the intuitive understanding is that the contract can automatically sell assets to repay the debt, but the actual design requires an EOA account as a liquidator/keeper, and even additional liquidation rewards. Many other products also have similar designs, because smart contracts cannot trigger themselves.

So, what about the abstraction of ERC4337 accounts? Most developers’ ideas are still focused on smart contract wallets, such as social recovery, Blockingymaster to enable ERC20 token payment for gas, and so on. For applications, such as the previously mentioned design of a lending platform, it is possible to achieve application triggering and status updates without the need for a liquidator role. In the future, new DApps will certainly appear to solve existing problems.

In addition, smart contract wallets will undoubtedly assist applications in the strong getting stronger. Smart contract wallet scalability is poor, and every application integration requires the development of corresponding contracts and ensuring security, otherwise it will affect the wallet’s existing users. This will lead wallet developers to integrate more mainstream applications. Of course, selling wallets and new solutions as a whole to applications is also a way of thinking.

Reference: https://twitter.com/ryanciz233/status/1678425246666305544

We will continue to update Blocking; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Blockchain

Circle stripped Poloniex, its valuation plummeted 80%

Circle is a world-renowned blockchain startup with investors including Goldman Sachs, IDG Capital, Bitcoin and hedge ...

Market

Exploring the evolution of the stablecoin market structure: Why can USDT always dominate the first place?

Stablecoin competition is an endless topic, as the industry struggles in its second decade, hoping that the market ca...

Blockchain

Deep Dive into Uniswap V4: A "Masterpiece" of Decentralized Exchange

Updates to Uniswap V4 could further enhance its position in the DEX space, with the "hooks" feature greatly improving...

News

Visit: What is behind the brush of the digital currency exchange?

Recently, TokenInsight released the blockchain industry report "Exchange Real Estate Volume Report (I)" poi...

Blockchain

The original market maker is not "Zhuang"? What is the significance of the coin safety ball recruitment market?

On September 30th, the company announced that it has launched the Global Markets Program and will recruit Market Make...

Blockchain

The exchange's big melee is coming soon, new assets, new flows, new mechanisms, which one is the magic weapon?

The first half of 2019 is definitely the most lively six months in the history of digital currency. This kind of exci...